国内外针灸治疗便秘的认知度调查

摘要

背景：由中国中医科学院研究生院组织硕、博士生共16人，于2015年7月12日至8月9日，远赴欧洲奥地利维也纳、萨尔茨堡、法国巴黎、德国柏林、海德堡、卢森堡、比利时布鲁塞尔、意大利威尼斯、捷克布拉格、荷兰阿姆斯特丹等地进行了中医药交流并做实地调研。目的：通过中奥-欧盟暑期交流平台，调查欧洲各国家各地区、以及交流团队中其他学校成员（国内外）对针灸治疗便秘的认知度，并将结果进行梳理分析。方法：采用电子版本的自填式问卷调查法对普通人群进行调查。结果：我们获得游学期间80份调查问卷和同期国内的72份调查问卷。1）对针灸了解与否：欧洲组有11.9％的人了解针灸，而中国组有78.9％（与同期国内组79％相当），2组之间差异有统计学意义（ P＜0.05）；2）知道针灸治疗便秘与否：欧洲组有7.1％的人知道，而中国组有73.7％（与同期国内组56％相比有很大的差异），2组之间差异有统计学意义（ P＜0.05）；3）如果便秘，您接受针灸治疗吗？欧洲组有4.8％的人接受，而中国组有52.6％（与同期国内组65％相比有些许的差异），2组之间差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；4）如果便秘更倾向于选择哪种方式A 选择西药欧洲组有76.2％，而中国组有28.9％（与同期国内组10％相比有明显差异），2组之间差异有统计学意义（ P＜0.05）；B选择中草药欧洲组有4.8％，而中国组有23.7％（与同期国内组60％相比有明显差异），2组之间差异有统计学意义（ P＜0.05）；C选择针灸欧洲组有4.8％，而中国组有28.9％（与同期国内组12％相比有明显差异），2组之间差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；D选择其他方式欧洲组有14.3％，而中国组有18.4％（与同期国内组18％相当），2组之间差异有统计学意义（ P＜0.05）。结论：整理分析数据后我们初步得出，在欧洲一些国家和地区普通人群对于针灸治疗便秘的认知度较低，中医针灸知识在欧洲的推广还需我们做进一步的努力。%Objective:To investigate the degree of cognition on acupuncture used for constipation in Vienna , Salzburg in Austria , Paris in France, Berlin and Heidelberg in Germany, Brussels in Belgium, Luxembourg, Venice in Italy, Prague in the Czech Re-public , Amsterdam in the Netherlands .Methods:Electronic questionnaires were adopted for the survey in ordinary citizens .Re-sults:Eighty questionnaires were collected at abroad and 72 questionnaires were collected in China .1 ) Whether know acupunc-ture or not:11.9%in Europe Group knows acupuncture , and 78.9% was in China Group ( similar to the corresponding data in China, 79%), showing significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).2) Whether know acupuncture being used for constipation:Europe Group was 7.1%, and China Group was 73.7%( different from corresponding data in China , 56%) , with significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05);3)Will you try acupuncture if had constipation:4.8%in Europe Group will try, and 52.6%in China Group (a slight difference from the corresponding data in China , 65%), which indicated significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).4) For constipation, you would prefer: In Europe Group 76.2% chose Western medicine, and 28.9%in China Group (different from the corresponding data in China 10%) with significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05);4.8%in Europe Group might choose Chinese herbs , and 23.7%in Group China (different from the corresponding data in China 60%), and there was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05).4.8% in Europe Group chose acupuncture and 28.9% in China Group (different from the corresponding data in China 12%), with significant difference between two groups (P<0.05); 14.3% in Europe Group chose to use other methods and 18.4% in China Group ( similar to corresponding data in China , 18%) , and there was significant difference between the two groups ( P<0.05 ) .Con-clusion:There is still a large space for developing and disseminating the culture about acupuncture in European countries .