从“采乐”商标争议案看商评委裁定的法律效力--兼谈《商标法（修订草案征求意见稿）》第5章

摘要

在长达12年的“采乐CAILE”商标争议案中，商标权人收到了商标评审委员会的3次裁定，经历了法院的一审、二审和再审。虽然“采乐CAILE”最终得以维持，但“迟来的正义是非正义”，商标权人在商标争议过程中遭受重大损失。正值商标法修订之际，我国应吸收行政立法的最新成果，全面体现行政行为确定力理论，引入情势变更原则和信赖利益保护制度，避免类似案件再次发生。%The trademark holder accepted three judgments after the first , second instance and reexamination , lasting for al-most a decade in the case of “Caile” dispute.Although the trademark of “Caile” maintains finally , but justice delayed is justice denied.As a result, the trademark holder is suffering heavy losses.When amending the Trademark Act , it needs to give full consideration of absorbing the latest achievement , comprehensively reflecting the theory of administrative act effect, protection of reliable trust.