目的:评价国内外发表体育运动科学领域meta分析的方法学质量。方法:电子检索中国知网(CNKI)、Web of Science,选用OQAQ量表进行方法学质量评价。结果:共纳入14篇合格文献,OQAQ均分5.07±1.86分,属有小错误;方法学质量问题体现在研究者对文献筛选偏倚控制意识不高,没对原始研究使用真实性评价标准,缺乏全面恰当评价真实性。结论:按照一定的规范进行体育运动科学领域试验设计和系统评价,以提高该领域循证证据的质量。%Aim:The purpose of this study was to systematically e-valuate the quality of meta-analyses that address topics pertinent to sport science. Method: A systematic search of CNKI, Web of Science was undertaken. To assess report quality, the included meta-analyses were assessed using the Overview Quality Assess-ment Questionnaire (OQAQ). Results: A total of 14 reports of meta-analyses were included. The overall quality of reports of meta-analyses was found to be with minor flaws, with an estimat-ed mean overall OQAQ score of 5.07 ±1.86. It was noted prob-lems with the reporting of key characteristics of meta-analyses, such as avoidance of bias in the inclusion of studies and appro-priately referring to the validity of the included studies. Conclu-sion:Researchers and reviewers should be encouraged to follow established methodological guidelines for the conduct and report-ing of studies in the field of sport science.
展开▼