两种不同空气净化方式对NICU病房的影响

摘要

目的比较不同空气净化方式对病房医院感染的影响，探讨更适合NICU病房空气质量的管理办法。方法在同个季度的不同月份采用两种不同的空气净化方式，平板自然沉降法检测病房内空气净化后的细菌总数，监测各个月份医院感染发生情况，应用SPSS 10.0统计分析。结果采用自然通风换气与空气消毒机消毒后病房的细菌总数比较没有显著性差异(﹥0.05)，两种方法而发生医院感染率同样没有显著性差异(﹥0.05)。与空气消毒机净化室内空气方式比，采用自然通风方式时病房患儿平均住院日数更短，平均少0.93d。结论在自然通风良好的状态下，做好通风时间对患儿的保暖，在NICU病房采用合理的自然通风可能对患儿的康复更有利。%Objective To compare the influence of dif erent air purification way about hospital infection, explore more suitable measures for the administration of NICU ward air quality. Methods In the same quarter of dif erent months using two dif erent ways of air purification, use the method of flat natural sedimentation to monitoring the ward air after purification, the total number of bacteria, hospital infection occurred in monitoring the situation, application of spss10.0 statistical analysis.Results After using natural ventilation and Air disinfection machine to disinfection ward of the total number of bacteria is no significant dif erence ( ﹥0.05), two methods and the hospital infection rate is also no significant dif erence( ﹥0.05). compare with air purifying indoor using air disinfection machine, natural ventilation mode can shorter average hospital stay, an average of 0.93 days.Conclusion Under the conditions of natural ventilation, keep children warm when ventilated time , employing reasonable natural ventilation in the NICU ward might be more beneficial to the patient's recovery.