首页> 外文期刊>资源与生态学报(英文版) >基于VSD模型的区域生态系统脆弱性评价--以广西西江经济带为例
【24h】

基于VSD模型的区域生态系统脆弱性评价--以广西西江经济带为例

机译:基于VSD模型的区域生态系统脆弱性评价--以广西西江经济带为例

摘要

The interactive effects of natural and human factors on ecosystems have been well studied, and the quantitative assessment of large-scale ecological vulnerability caused by natural and human factors is now one of the most active topics in the ifeld. Taking the Guangxi Xijiang River Economic Belt in southwest China (GXEB) as a case study, we assess ecological vulnerability based on the Vulnerability Scoping Diagram (VSD) model. The indices system is decomposed into three sub objects, ten elements and 25 indicators layer by layer, which included factors from both natural and human ifelds. Results indicate that zones with lower, middle-lower, middle, middle-higher and higher vulnerability account for 11.31%, 22.63%, 27.60%, 24.39%, and 14.07%, respectively. The western and eastern parts of GXEB are more vulnerable than the central part and the mountain and urban areas are of higher vulnerability than the basins and river valleys. Compared with a vulnerability assessment based on natural factors only, it is concluded that human activities indeed cause the transition from naturally stable zones to vulnerable zones. The nature-dominated vulnerable zones are different with human-dominated ones in size and distribution, the latter being smaller, more scattered and distributed in urban areas and their surroundings. About 53%of total construction land is distributed in zones with middle and middle-higher ecological vulnerability;less vulnerable zones should attract construction in the future. Relevant suggestions are proposed on how to reduce vulnerability according to inducing factors. The VSD model has a signiifcant advantage in the quantitative evaluation of ecological vulnerability, but is insufficient to distinguish nature- or human-dominated vulnerability quantitatively.%生态系统脆弱性受到自然与人文因素双重影响。以广西西江经济带为例,采用VSD模型,通过暴露度、敏感性和适应能力分解脆弱性,构建包含自然和人为因素的25指标的评价体系,开展脆弱性评价与分区。结果表明,不脆弱区、一般区、脆弱区、很脆弱区和极脆弱区分别占11.31%、22.63%、27.60%、24.39%和14.07%,东西部地区脆弱性较高,中部地区脆弱性较低;自然因素导致的脆弱区主要分布于东西部山区,人为因素主导的脆弱区分布于中部盆地的城镇及其周边;经济带约53%的建设用地分布于很脆弱区和脆弱区,未来新增建设用地需要重点向不脆弱区和一般区转移。根据分区结果和诱因差异,提出了不同类型区开发与保护的相关建议。
机译:生态系统的自然和人为因素的互动效果得到了很好的研究,并且自然和人类因素引起的大规模生态脆弱性的定量评估现在是IFELD中最活跃的主题之一。以中国西南(GXEB)为例,以广西Xijiang河经济带作为一个案例研究,我们基于漏洞范围(VSD)模型评估生态脆弱性。索引系统通过层分解为三个子对象,十个元素和25个指示器层,其中包括来自自然和人类IFELDS的因素。结果表明,下下,中等,中高和高漏洞的区域分别为11.31%,22.63%,27.60%,24.39%和14.07%。 GXEB的西部和东部地区比中央部分和城市地区更容易受到比盆地和河谷更高的脆弱性。与仅基于自然因素的漏洞评估相比,人们的结论是人类活动确实导致从自然稳定区转变为脆弱的区域。性质主导的弱势区域与人占尺寸和分配的不同区域不同,后者在城市地区及其周围环境中更小,更散落和分布。大约53%的建筑用地分布在中间和中等生态脆弱性的区域中;较弱的区域应在未来吸引建设。提出了根据诱导因素减少脆弱性的相关建议。 VSD模型在定量评估生态脆弱性的定量评估中具有显着的优势,但不足以定量区分性质或人为主导的脆弱性。%生活系统脆弱性受到自己与人文因素双影响。以广西西江影响。使用VSD模型,通过暴露度,敏感性和适应能力分享,构建构建自行和人为因素的25指标的评价体,开展明,不起作用,不错,一切,脆弱区, 11.31%,22.63%,22.63%,27.60%,24.39%和14.07%,国东地区区较高,中炎地区较低;自我因素导致的脆弱区主要分布山区,人为因素主导的脆弱区分布于中间部地的城市镇其周边;经济带约53%的人使用的地分布于很脆弱区和脆弱区,起来新闻用地需要重点不等和一串。根据分类结果和诱因,提出了不成语开发与保护的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号