孕产妇分娩结局和新生儿应用不同分娩方式的影响观察

摘要

目的：：分析研究不同分娩方式对于孕产妇分娩结局以及新生儿的影响。方法：选取2013年1月~2014年1月的孕产妇资料112例实施回顾性分析，按照分娩方式将112例孕产妇分为3组，剖宫产组37例，自然阴道分娩组37例，择期引产组38例，对3组孕产妇的产时、并发症、住院时间和新生儿评分进行记录和比较，将比较结果实施统计学分析。结果：3组患者产时和产后并发症比较存在明显的差异(P<0.05)，具有统计学意义；3组患者的输血率、切口愈合率以及产后出血率比较存在明显的差异(P<0.05)，具有统计学意义；3组患者的产褥期感染率对比不存在明显的差异(P>0.05)，不具有统计学意义；剖宫产组新生儿出现轻度窒息的几率和其它两组比较存在明显的差异(P<0.05)，具有统计学意义。结论：3种分娩方式各有利弊，剖宫产患者手术之后的并发症比较少，但是患者住院时间长，总体比较安全，择期引产患者产后出血率比较大，切口延缓时间相对比较长，自然分娩患者对产道损伤大。%Objective:To study the effect of different delivery methods on pregnant women and pregnant women.Methods:112 cases of pregnant women in a hospital from January 2013 to January 2014 were taken as research obj ect,whose data were analyzed retrospectively,and who were divided into 3 groups according to different delivery methods,37 cases in cesarean section group,37 cases in natural vaginal delivery group,38 cases in spontaneous vaginal delivery group.Then the delivery time,complication,hospital stay of score of newborn of the three groups were compared.Results:The complication during the delivery and after the de-livery of the three groups is significantly different (P<0.05),with statistical significance;blood transfusion rate,wound healing rate and postpartum hemorrhage rate of the three groups are significantly different (P<0.05);the puerperal infection rate of the three groups does not exist obvious difference (P>0.05),with no statistical significance;the incidence of mild asphyxia of the newborn in the cesarean section group has signif-icant differences to the other two groups (P<0.05),with statistical significance.Conclusion:There are ad-vantages and disadvantages of the three kinds of delivery methods,and the complication of the cesarean sec-tion patients is relatively small,but the hospital stay is relative long and safe.The bleeding incidence in spon-taneous vaginal delivery group is relatively large,incision delay time is relatively long,and the birth canal in-j ury of the natural childbirth is large.