比较非胸腔镜辅助改良 Nuss 手术与胸腔镜手术矫治漏斗胸的疗效

摘要

Objective:To compare the curative effect of treating funnel chest diseases by thoracoscope as-sisted improved Nuss procedure and thoracoscope surgery.Methods:Select 80 patients with funnel chest treated in a hospital from August 2012 to August 2015 ,who were randomly divided into control group and observation group,treated by thoracoscope assisted Nuss procedure and the thoracoscope assisted improved Nuss procedure respectively.Results:The average operation time of observation group was (21.1±1.3)min, significantly shorter than that of the control group (34.6±1.6)min (P <0.05).The intraoperative bleeding and the incidence of complications have no significant difference (P >0.05).Conclusion:Application of thora-coscope assisted improved Nuss procedure has a good effect for treating funnel chest with high safety.%目的：：对比应用非胸腔镜辅助改良 Nuss 手术、胸腔镜手术对漏斗胸患者进行矫治的效果。方法：选择2012年8月~2015年8月期间在某院接受治疗的80例漏斗胸患者随机分为对照组、观察组,分别给予胸腔镜辅助 Nuss 手术、非胸腔镜辅助改良Nuss 手术进行治疗。结果：观察组平均手术时间为(21.1±1.3)min,显著短于对照组的(34.6±1.6)min(P <0.05)；两组术中出血、并发症发生率等比较无显著性差异(P >0.05)。结论：应用非胸腔镜辅助改良 Nuss 手术对漏斗胸进行治疗效果好,安全性高。