The antique market is booming , and the disputes arising from the antique transaction are also in-creasing .In judicial practice , the ruling of dispute settlement in some cases favors business rules and in some other cases the laws.The former is the prevailing practice , i.e.purchases of forgeries are not refundable .An antique transaction is a contract , the Contractual Law and General Provisions of the Civil Law both have provisions concern-ing this category of disputes .In future judicial practice , breaking trade barriers , referencing laws are not essentially necessary .From the perspective of respecting social autonomy and the autonomy of contracting parties , it is impor-tant to favor the utility of trade rules .Meanwhile , it is as important to optimize and legislate to enforce business practices.%在古玩交易市场日益繁荣的同时，古玩交易引发的纠纷也日益增多。司法实践中，对古玩交易纠纷的裁判，有的主张适用行业惯例，有的主张适用法律规定。目前在司法实践中基本主张优先适用行业惯例，即“打眼”一般不退货。但是，古玩交易作为一种买卖合同，我国《合同法》以及《民法通则》对此类纠纷均作了相关规定。在未来司法实践中，打破行业惯例壁垒，援引法律规定并不具有必要性，从尊重社会自治、交易双方自治的角度，更应该肯定行业惯例的效用。同时，优化行业惯例，使行业惯例上升为法律具有重大意义。
展开▼
