Vicarious Liability , as an important rule in the traditional civil tort law , primarily used in em-ployer-employee relationship , guardianship relationship , reflects the values of civil law protecting the inter-ests of vulnerable parties and seeking a reasonable distribution of unfortunately harm .The United States copy-right law , also through cases introduced this rules , gradually identified types of vicarious liability cases , bring-ing the judicial protection of copyright with great convenience .Vicarious liability in the field of copyright law not only reflects the law ’ s moral values of fairness and justice , but also meets the requirements of economic ef-ficiency .Article 22 of paragraph 4 in China's the Right of Communication through Information Network Regula-tions are about vicarious liability rules , but its liability requirements has defects , putting Internet service pro-viders overweight supervision and control obligation , and conflicting with indirect infringement rule .When es-tablishing the copyright vicarious liability rules under Network environment , we need analyze the status of net-work operators , assess their source of profit and supervision control ability and avoid interference with its nor-mal business activities .%作为民法侵权责任法中的重要制度，替代责任主要适用于雇佣和监护关系，体现了民法保护弱势群体、合理分配不幸损害的价值理念。在著作权领域，美国率先通过判例引入替代责任，并逐渐将适用这一规则的案件类型化，为著作权保护提供了极大的便利。著作权替代责任制度不仅体现了法的公平正义价值取向，也符合法的经济效率要求。我国《信息网络传播权保护条例》第22条第4款是关于替代责任的规定，但其责任构成要件存在缺陷，给网络服务提供商施加了过重的监督控制义务，且与间接侵权规则相冲突。网络环境下建立著作权替代责任规则，需要分析网络中经营者所处的地位，评估其盈利来源和监督控制能力，避免干扰其正常的经营活动。
展开▼
