Objective:To explore the differences between percutaneous reduction hollow screw internal fixation and open reduction plate internal fixation in the treatment of Sanders II type calcaneal fracture.Method:68 patients with Sanders II type calcaneal fracture from January, 2012 to February, 2013 were divided into poking group and open reduction group, 34 cases in each group. They were treated with poking reduction and internal fixation, as well as open reduction and internal fixation, and then followed up for one year successfully. The operation time, hospitalization time, wound healing time and the amount of bleeding were compared. The Maryland foot score system was employed to assess the function recovery of two groups and the related complications were recorded.Result:The operation time, hospitalization time, incision healing time and the amount of bleeding in operation of poking group were significantly less than the open reduction group; The excellent rate of functional recovery of poking group and open reduction group were 79.41% and 82.35%. The difference between two groups had no statistical significance; the complication rate of poking group and open reduction group were 2.94% and 17.65%. The difference between two groups had statistical significance.Conclusion:Poking reduction combined with internal fixation for the treatment of Sanders II type calcaneal fracture can not only reduce the wound and intraoperative bleeding, shorten operation and hospitalization time, but also prevent the occurrence of complications.
展开▼
