COPE网站中科研不端典型案例分析

摘要

本文选择COPE网站中出现的伪造、篡改以及剽窃这三种科研不端行为的典型案例进行细致分析,深入探讨COPE在处理上述三种科学不端行为的判别标准及其处理方法,指出科研不端行为判别主要标准在于主观意识以及客观行为事实,且与诚实错误有着本质的区别.%The paper analyzes the typical research misconduct cases, including fabrication, falsification and plagiarism on COPE websites, discusses COPE's judging criterion and processing ways of the three research misconduct behaviors above in detail. The authors especially emphasize that the key criterions of judging research misconduct lie in suspects' subject responsibility and objective misconduct fact, which is the essential difference from the honest error.