Previous studies for electronic journals mostly used qualitative methods, lacking in quantitative methods. Therefore, to establish an evaluation system for electronic journals, which conforms to the Internet and the development of journals, wil further enhance the scientificity and effectiveness of journal evaluation, and meanwhile contribute to its construction and development. This paper firstly analyzes and summarizes the traditional evaluation methods, indicators and systems for academic journals. Further, this paper builds an evaluation system for electronic journals with qualitative and quantitative indicators under the new Internet environment, which considers the data from the Internet as one of the data sources for evaluation and combines the traditional indicators with new ones from the Internet.12 electronic journals are selected as samples to test the effects of the evaluation system with rich and objective raw data. The results show that the comprehensive evaluating indicator system is effective for achieving bet er evaluation results for electronic journals. The theories and methods of Webometrics wil play an important role in the scientific evaluation in the Internet era.%目前对于纯电子期刊的评价研究较多采用定性分析方法，缺乏定量评价手段。因此，建立一个符合当前网络环境与期刊发展状况的期刊评价体系可以进一步提高纯电子期刊评价的科学性与有效性，同时推动其发展建设。本研究首先通过对传统期刊评价方法、指标与体系的分析研究及总结，针对当前的新型网络环境特性，引入网络数据作为评价数据源，结合传统指标与新型网络计量指标，构建了一个将定性、定量指标相结合的纯电子期刊评价体系。然后，选取12种纯电子期刊作为样本进行实证研究，利用丰富且客观的原始数据，检验评价体系的效果。研究结果表明，运用综合性的评价指标体系，能够在纯电子期刊评价中取得较好的评价结果。网络信息计量指标与Altmetrics指标在纯电子期刊的评价中具有良好的表现。网络信息计量理论与方法在网络时代的科学评价工作中将发挥重要作用。
展开▼
