不同雾化吸入方式治疗小儿支气管哮喘的效果观察

摘要

目的：观察不同雾化吸入方式治疗小儿哮喘患者的临床疗效。方法选取2011年8月～2013年1月湛江市第一中医医院收治的支气管哮喘患儿86例，随机分为2组（n=43）。观察组采用氧驱动雾化吸入方式治疗，对照组采用超声雾化吸入方式治疗。观察2组患者治疗后临床症状消失时间、肺功能及血氧饱和度的变化情况。结果2组患儿治疗前与治疗后临床症状消失时间、肺功能及血氧饱和度等临床指标比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组患儿治疗后临床症状消失时间、肺功能及血氧饱和度等临床指标与对照组比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论氧驱动雾化吸入方式与超声雾化吸入方式对小儿支气管哮喘均有明显疗效，但氧驱动雾化吸入方式具有刺激小、明显提高患儿血氧饱和等优势，更适合运用于小儿哮喘的治疗。%Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of atomizing inhalation of different methods in the treatment of children with asthma. Methods 86 bronchial asthma children from August 2011 to January 2013 in the hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group, each group of 43 cases. Observation group with oxygen atomizing inhalation treatment, control group used ultrasonic atomizing inhalation therapy.Changes of the two groups were observed after treatment of the disappearing time of clinical symptoms,lung function and blood oxygen saturation. Results Before and after treatment, the disappearing time of clinical symptoms,lung function and blood oxygen saturation and other clinical parameters in two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05);After treatment, the disappearing time of clinical symptoms, pulmonary function and blood oxygen saturation and other clinical indicators in bservation group compared with control group was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Oxygen atomizing inhalation and ultrasonic nebulization inhalation methods on pediatric bronchial asthma has obvious curative effect, but the oxygen atomizing inhalation has small stimulation, significantly improve the patientsblood oxygen saturation and other advantages, is more suitablefor the treatment of asthma in children.