两种气道湿化方法及综合气道护理对机械通气疗效的影响

摘要

Objective To investigate the effect of different airway humidification method and comprehensive airway nursing methods on the mechanical ventilation. Methods 80 patients admitted to our hospital using random number table were divided into observation group and control group,40 cases in each group. Control group received intermittent airway perfusion method for airway humidification,the observation group to implement trace pump continuous airway humidification,two groups of patients with the implementation of comprehensive nursing. Results In the observation group in the treatment effect,with tube time and hospitalization time were significantly better than the control group,al the differences by comparing display significantly,P < 0.05,statistical significance. Conclusion For the use of mechanical ventilation in the treatment of patients with implementation of micro theory volume pump continuous airway humidification treatment can significantly improve the treatment effect,has a high value of promotion.%目的：探讨不同气道湿化方法和综合气道护理方法对机械通气疗效的影响。方法将我院收治的80例患者使用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组，均40例。对照组实施间歇气道灌注法进行气道湿化，观察组实施微量泵持续气道湿化，两组患者实施综合护理。结果观察组在治疗效果、带管时间以及住院时间上均优于对照组，差异经比较后显示具有统计学意义，P ＜0.05。结论对需使用机械通气法治疗的患者实施微量泵持续气道湿化法治疗可提升治疗效果。