首页> 外文学位 >Local Parks and Recreation Agencies Use of Systems Thinking to Address Preventive Public Health Factors
【24h】

Local Parks and Recreation Agencies Use of Systems Thinking to Address Preventive Public Health Factors

机译:当地公园和娱乐机构使用系统思想解决预防性公共卫生因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many leaders believe that local communities should play a role in preventive health. Within the United States (U.S.), some form of governmental agency typically manages local public facilities, spaces, lands, and recreation programs. These departments are usually identified as parks and recreation (P&R) or some similar variation. Public health (PH) evidence has increasingly pointed to local P&R agencies as a critical setting for promoting health. Addressing desired PH outcomes is a growing focus for P&R agencies, but many have limited resources or strategies on which to base their actions. However, the research base is also growing. The global research question has shifted from asking IF P&R agencies can positively affect PH factors, to HOW they can best do so with limited resources.;This dissertation research featured a mixed-methods approach including a thematic literature review, exploration through a three-stage Delphi panel study with 17 P&R agency Key Informants, and a case study of two larger P&R agencies to deepen findings and identify strategies for local P&R agencies. This study was iterative, with each stage informed through review with all Informants. To help with potential limitations of the research methods and/or possible constraints due to personal experience and affiliations, a focus was maintained on transparency, continued search for the evidence-base, and asking, "what is missing?";The study first explored preventive health factors modified by P&R. The research investigated the theoretical basis of systems theory and potential systems thinking approach applications for local P&R agencies. Systems theory has been used previously in business and PH applications to describe concepts of how various components, actors, factors, and processes within a given system work together, and to help identify barriers, gaps, and opportunities for improved effectiveness.;Results indicate that the primary modifiable PH factors for P&R include increased physical activity, improved nutrition, enhanced safety or perception of safety, increased social and parental engagement, improved transportation and access to locations (especially nature), and cessation or reduced overconsumption of tobacco and alcohol. However, community-specific data on many of these various health factors are not yet readily available to public agencies. The continuing challenge at the local P&R management level is knowing the priority of the factors for a specific agency and/or partners to address.;This study furthered the theoretical knowledge base for both research and practice through summary of the primary factors, interactions, initiatives, and potential strategies for P&R agencies to address to facilitate change. The research examined how agencies may use a systems thinking approach to prioritize. Results indicate that it is critical within the system to focus on leadership to create a strong organizational culture of PH from P&R a cultural ethic of inclusion and equity; allocation of staff and financial resources; equitable access to assets and programs; collaboration; utilization of crime prevention and design strategies; increased health promotions; and centralized tracking of feasible measures. Conclusions include an adapted framework for a community systems thinking approach related to addressing the factors. There is also a need for better dissemination of research, evidencebased tools, and established methods. A conceptual framework is suggested to further address the gaps in knowledge transferal between P&R research and practice realms.
机译:许多领导人认为,当地社区应在预防保健方面发挥作用。在美国(美国),某种形式的政府机构通常管理当地的公共设施,场所,土地和娱乐计划。这些部门通常被确定为公园和娱乐场所(P&R)或类似的变体。公共卫生(PH)的证据越来越多地指出地方P&R机构是促进健康的关键环境。解决P&R机构日益关注的理想PH结果,但许多机构的行动资源和资源或策略有限。但是,研究基础也在增长。全球研究的问题已经从要求IF P&R机构可以对PH因子产生积极影响转变为如何在有限的资源下最好地做到这一点。本论文的研究采用了混合方法,包括专题文献综述,三阶段探索Delphi与17家P&R机构的主要信息提供者进行了小组研究,并以两家较大的P&R机构为例,以深化调查结果并确定当地P&R机构的策略。这项研究是反复进行的,每个阶段都通过与所有信息提供者的审查来告知。为了帮助解决研究方法的潜在限制和/或由于个人经验和从属关系而可能造成的限制,我们一直将重点放在透明度,继续寻找证据基础以及询问“缺少了什么?”上;该研究首先探讨了P&R修改的预防性健康因素。该研究调查了系统理论的理论基础以及本地P&R机构的潜在系统思维方法的应用。系统理论先前已在业务和PH应用程序中用于描述给定系统中各种组件,参与者,因素和流程如何协同工作的概念,并有助于发现障碍,差距和提高有效性的机会。 P&R的主要可修改PH因子包括增加体育锻炼,改善营养,提高安全性或对安全的认识,增加社会和父母的参与度,改善交通和出入地点(尤其是自然环境)以及戒烟或减少过量食用烟酒。但是,公共机构尚未获得有关这些各种健康因素中许多的特定于社区的数据。本地P&R管理层持续面临的挑战是要知道特定机构和/或合作伙伴需要解决的因素的优先级;该研究通过总结主要因素,相互作用和倡议,进一步为研究和实践提供了理论知识基础,以及P&R机构应对变化的潜在策略。该研究调查了代理商如何使用系统思考方法确定优先级。结果表明,在系统内至关重要的是,集中精力于领导才能,根据P&R的包容性和公平性文化伦理,建立强大的PH组织文化。人员分配和财务资源;公平获得资产和计划;合作;利用犯罪预防和设计策略;增加健康促进;并集中跟踪可行的措施。结论包括一个针对社区系统思考方法的改进框架,该方法与解决这些因素有关。还需要更好地传播研究,循证工具和既定方法。建议建立一个概念框架,以进一步解决P&R研究与实践领域之间知识转移的空白。

著录项

  • 作者

    Penbrooke, Teresa L.;

  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Public administration.;Recreation.;Public health.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 423 p.
  • 总页数 423
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号