首页> 外文学位 >Manufacturing a socialist modernity: The architecture of industrialized housing in Czechoslovakia, 1945--1956.
【24h】

Manufacturing a socialist modernity: The architecture of industrialized housing in Czechoslovakia, 1945--1956.

机译:打造社会主义的现代性:捷克斯洛伐克工业化住房的体系结构,1945--1956年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although it is difficult to see the crumbling, gray facades of the former Eastern Bloc as great testaments to the potentials of modern architecture, these buildings did reflect a dedication to technological innovation, social equality, and formal clarity unrivaled in the twentieth century. Built in an era that the West has commonly portrayed as one of rupture, isolation, and deprivation, socialist architecture in Eastern Europe was in fact connected to contemporary experiments in the West and to the specific legacies of the region's interwar years. Focusing on the intersection of architects, housing design, and the state apparatus between 1945 and 1956, this case study seeks to understand the development and deployment of modern mass-housing types in Czechoslovakia from the avant-garde-inspired projects of the immediate postwar era to the industrialized panel buildings of the 1950s.; The dissertation also examines the organization of design practice in the aftermath of World War II and the creation of Stavoprojekt, the state-run architectural offices in 1948. The chapters show the extent to which the postwar government and its architectural leadership adopted and carried forward already established models of architectural modernity as the basis of their claims to legitimacy. Through a detailed study of the housing types and production methods employed by architects at Stavoprojekt, the dissertation expands our understanding of the early years of communism in Czechoslovakia by emphasizing the fluid and negotiated relationships between architects and the political structure. The project questions the image of the oppressive Communist Party imposing itself on unwilling architects and shows that in the early years of communism, there was genuine support for the new system. As part of a reassessment of the timeline of transformation and change in the postwar period, the project proposes 1950, rather than 1945 or 1948, as a turning point in the history of postwar modernism.
机译:尽管很难将前东方集团破旧不堪的灰色外墙视为现代建筑潜力的有力证明,但这些建筑确实反映了对技术创新,社会平等和二十世纪无与伦比的形式清晰的奉献。东欧的社会主义建筑建于一个西方通常将其描述为破裂,孤立和匮乏的时代,实际上与西方的当代实验以及该地区两次战争时期的特定遗产息息相关。该案例研究着眼于1945年至1956年之间的建筑师,住房设计和国家机构的交集,旨在从战后即刻的前卫项目中了解捷克斯洛伐克现代大规模住房类型的发展和部署。 1950年代工业化的镶板建筑。本论文还研究了第二次世界大战后的设计实践的组织以及1948年建立的国有建筑事务所Stavoprojekt。这些章节显示了战后政府及其建筑领导层在何种程度上已经采用并发扬光大建立了建筑现代性模型作为其合法性主张的基础。通过详细研究Stavoprojekt建筑师使用的住房类型和生产方法,论文通过强调建筑师与政治结构之间的流动性和协商关系,扩大了我们对捷克斯洛伐克早期共产主义的理解。该项目质疑压迫性共产党强加于不愿接受的建筑师的形象,并表明在共产主义的早期,对新制度的真正支持。作为对战后转型和变化时间表的重新评估的一部分,该项目提出将1950年而不是1945年或1948年作为战后现代主义历史的转折点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zarecor, Kimberly Elman.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 History European.; Architecture.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 533 p.
  • 总页数 533
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 欧洲史;建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号