首页> 外文学位 >Thus Spoke the Body: The Problem of Affirmation in Nietzsche's Philosophy.
【24h】

Thus Spoke the Body: The Problem of Affirmation in Nietzsche's Philosophy.

机译:因此,辐射身体:尼采哲学中的肯定问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation challenges the predominant idea of Nietzsche's philosophy of power, offering a new account of affirmation and its relationship to "will to power." In contrast to seeing affirmation as a synonym for "saying yes to life," I ask: how affirmation (Bejahung ) functions, what kinds of shifts we find in Nietzsche's works, what is its relationship to the primacy of music, the body and the Dionysian (dionysische), and what models are offered for affirmation? Finally, I examine the extent to which affirmation is attainable. Drawing upon an extensive conceptual, historical and comparative philosophical analysis of Nietzsche's German oeuvre and his early unpublished lessons on rhetoric, I argue that genuine affirmation is a largely unconscious process, best described as a musically inspired bodily resonance that the largely unconscious drives may acquire through creative movement, such as dance and yoga. I challenge three prevailing assumptions: first, that Nietzsche's thought is characterized by contradiction, showing how this view is misplaced. Second, I challenge the idea that affirmation is a cognitive stance and that being described in mutually exclusive terms, it leads to a paradox. I argue that a musical approach to Nietzsche's texts, together with his methodological advice on love as the supreme Macht, show that will to power is the foremost form the drives may acquire through affirmation. Instead of a synonym for "life" or "power," will to power, as the know-how to love, is what Nietzsche's musically inspired bodily resonance and the Dionysian arts may teach us, through creative movement. It is this highest kind of will to power that Nietzsche envisions as the right lived practice. Thus Spoke the Body: The Problem of Affirmation in Nietzsche's Philosophy takes seriously Nietzsche's methodological emphasis on the body as a contest of largely unconscious and creative drives and his aim to compose "music with words, providing an innovative understanding of what affirmation looks like as a bodily process, how Nietzsche advices to acquire it, and how the perplexing paradox is resolved in terms of the Dionysian arts.
机译:本文对尼采的权力哲学的主要思想提出了挑战,提出了新的肯定及其与“权力意志”的关系。与将肯定看作是“对生活说是”的同义词相反,我问:肯定(贝贾洪)的功能如何,我们在尼采的作品中发现了哪些转变,它与音乐,身体和音乐的首要地位之间的关系是什么? Dionysian(dionysische),以及提供哪些模型进行确认?最后,我研究了可以肯定的程度。通过对尼采的德国作品及其早期未发表的关于修辞学的课程进行广泛的概念,历史和比较哲学分析,我认为真正的肯定是一个很大程度上无意识的过程,最好描述为音乐激发的身体共鸣,大部分无意识的动力都可以通过这种方式获得创造性的运动,例如舞蹈和瑜伽。我对三个普遍的假设提出质疑:首先,尼采的思想具有矛盾性,表明这种观点是错位的。其次,我质疑肯定是一种认知立场,并且以互斥的方式描述肯定会导致悖论。我认为,对尼采的文本采取音乐方法,再加上他对作为至高无上的爱的爱情的方法论建议,都表明,权力的意志是通过肯定获得的动力的最主要形式。尼采的音乐灵感激发了身体的共鸣,而酒神艺术则通过创造性的运动教给我们,而不是“生命”或“力量”的代名词,而是将力量作为爱的专有技术。尼采将这种最高权力意志设想为正确的实践。因此,谈到身体:尼采哲学中的肯定问题,认真对待了尼采在方法论上的重视,这是一场很大程度上无意识和创造性驱动力的竞赛,他的目的是“用文字创作音乐,对肯定看起来像什么提供了创新的理解”。身体过程,尼采如何提出建议,以及如何解决狄奥尼主义艺术中的困惑悖论。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    The New School.;

  • 授予单位 The New School.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Music.;Dance.;Aesthetics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 266 p.
  • 总页数 266
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号