首页> 外文学位 >The effects of teaching critical thinking and reading comprehension strategies on students' writing in developmental English in a community college.
【24h】

The effects of teaching critical thinking and reading comprehension strategies on students' writing in developmental English in a community college.

机译:社区大学教授批判性思维和阅读理解策略对学生英语写作的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The setting for this study was a community college in southeast Alabama, and the purpose was to determine whether the teaching of reading comprehension and critical thinking strategies along with English grammar and writing improved students' writing performance on a final in-class essay. Two intact classes of developmental English students were randomly assigned to a control group or treatment group. The control class received grammar and writing instruction, the same instruction as all English 093 students at the college. The treatment class also received grammar and writing instruction, but the instructor added reading comprehension and critical thinking instruction for the treatment group. Instruction time was the same for both groups; therefore, the control group received extra grammar exercises in lieu of the critical thinking and reading comprehension instruction. Data analyses revealed a statistically significant difference in the critical thinking scores for the treatment group; however, no statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups on the writing assessment. At posttest, a correlation was found to exist between the treatment group's vocabulary scores on the Nelson-Denny Reading Test and the critical thinking scores. The results, although not statistically significant for reading and essay writing scores, did indicate differences, but the small sample sizes did not yield statistically significant differences for the two. The treatment group's retention in the class was a noticeably higher percentage (63% for control group and 83% for the treatment group); however, these differences failed to yield a statistical significance. Further studies are needed in order to explore the possibilities of obtaining statistically significant results with larger sample sizes.
机译:这项研究的背景是阿拉巴马州东南部的一所社区大学,目的是确定阅读理解和批判性思维策略以及英语语法和写作的教学是否在课堂上的最后一篇论文中提高学生的写作表现。将两个完整的发展英语学生班随机分配到对照组或治疗组。对照班接受语法和写作指导,与该学院所有英语093名学生的指导相同。治疗班也接受了语法和写作指导,但指导老师为治疗组增加了阅读理解和批判性思维指导。两组的授课时间相同。因此,对照组接受了额外的语法练习来代替批判性思维和阅读理解指导。数据分析显示,治疗组的批判性思维得分在统计学上有显着差异。但是,两组在写作评估上没有发现统计学上的显着差异。在后测中,发现尼尔森丹尼阅读测验中治疗组的词汇得分与批判性思维得分之间存在相关性。结果虽然对阅读和论文写作分数没有统计学意义,但确实表明存在差异,但小样本量并未对两者产生统计学上的显着差异。治疗组在类别中的保留率明显更高(对照组为63%,治疗组为83%);但是,这些差异未能产生统计学意义。为了探索在更大样本量下获得具有统计意义的结果的可能性,需要进行进一步的研究。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Auburn University.;

  • 授予单位 Auburn University.;
  • 学科 Education Community College.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.;Education Language and Literature.;Education Reading.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 159 p.
  • 总页数 159
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;教育;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号