首页> 外文学位 >Is the Procurement Integrity Act 'Important' Enough for the Mandatory Disclosure Rule?: A Look at the Procurement Integrity Act and the Case for its Inclusion in the Mandatory Disclosure Rule.
【24h】

Is the Procurement Integrity Act 'Important' Enough for the Mandatory Disclosure Rule?: A Look at the Procurement Integrity Act and the Case for its Inclusion in the Mandatory Disclosure Rule.

机译:强制性披露规则是否足以使“采购廉正法”“重要”?:看《采购廉正法》及其将其纳入强制性披露规则的理由。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Under the new mandatory disclosure rule, federal government contractors must report to the Government their violations of specified criminal laws and the civil False Claims Act, as well as any significant overpayments that they receive. Although this reporting requirement exists to enhance the procurement system's integrity, the plain language of the mandatory disclosure rule does not extend to the Procurement Integrity Act. Congress passed the Procurement Integrity Act in 1988, however, to enhance procurement integrity. The statute prohibits the misuse of confidential procurement information and identifies prohibited interactions between contractors and Government personnel. Because the Procurement Integrity Act has been described as an important law in combating procurement-related misconduct, the mandatory disclosure rule should include the Procurement Integrity Act.
机译:根据新的强制性披露规则,联邦政府承包商必须向政府报告其违反特定刑法和《民事虚假索赔法》的行为,以及所收到的任何重大超额付款。尽管存在此报告要求以增强采购系统的完整性,但强制公开规则的通俗易懂的语言并未扩展到《采购诚信法》。国会于1988年通过了《采购诚信法》,以增强采购的完整性。该法规禁止滥用机密采购信息,并指明承包商与政府人员之间禁止的互动。由于《采购诚信法》被描述为打击与采购相关的不当行为的重要法律,因此强制性披露规则应包括《采购诚信法》。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cox, Timothy M.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Law.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 93 p.
  • 总页数 93
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号