首页> 外文学位 >Integrating Engineering into Delaware's K-5 Classrooms: A Study of Pedagogical and Curricular Resources.
【24h】

Integrating Engineering into Delaware's K-5 Classrooms: A Study of Pedagogical and Curricular Resources.

机译:将工程技术整合到特拉华州的K-5课堂中:教学资源和课程资源研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines the personal and curricular resources available to Delaware's elementary teachers during a time of innovative curriculum change, i.e., their knowledge, goals and beliefs regarding elementary engineering curriculum and the pedagogical support to teach two Science and Engineering Practices provided by science teaching materials. Delaware was at the forefront of K-12 STEM movement, first to adopt statewide elementary curriculum materials to complement existing science units, and one of the first to adopt the new science standards---Next Generation Science Standards. What supports were available to teachers as they adapted and adopted this new curriculum? To investigate this question, I examined (1) teachers' beliefs about engineering and the engineering curriculum, and (2) the pedagogical supports available to teachers in selected science and engineering curriculum.;Teachers' knowledge, goals, and beliefs regarding Delaware's adoption of new elementary engineering curriculum were surveyed using an adapted version of the Design, Engineering, and Technology Survey (Hong, Purser, & Gardella, 2011; Yaser, Baker, Carpius, Krauss, & Roberts, 2006). Also, three open ended questions sought to reveal deeper understanding of teacher knowledge and understanding of engineering; their concerns about personal and systemic resources related to the new curriculum, its logistics, and feasibility; and their beliefs about the potential positive impact presented by the engineering education initiative. Teacher concerns were analyzed using the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (Hall & Hord, 2010). Lay understandings of engineering were analyzed by contrasting naive representations of engineering with three key characteristics of engineering adapted from an earlier study (Capobianco Diefes-Dux, Mena, & Weller, 2011).;Survey findings for teachers who had attended training and those who have not yet attended professional development in the new curriculum were compared with few notable differences. Almost all elementary teacher respondents were familiar with engineering and able to define it using one or more key characteristics. They valued the inclusion of engineering in the elementary curriculum; however trained and untrained teachers reported they were not confident about teaching it and were unaware of the new standards related to engineering. Teachers saw potential advantages or benefits of the new curriculum as helping improve science and math understanding, an opportunity to increase vocational awareness, and engaging students and motivating them to learn. Most teachers saw similar barriers to implementation-- lack of teacher knowledge, lack of time to learn about engineering and how to teach engineering, and lack of administrative support. Almost all were open to additional in-service training to learn more about this new curriculum.;Three fifth grade science units were examined for evidence of teacher pedagogical support in teaching two Science and Engineering Practices (SEP) advocated by the Next Generation Science Standards. An analytic framework was developed based upon two NGSS SEPs: Asking questions, defining problems and Engaging in argument from evidence. Findings revealed that the kits varied greatly in their pedagogical approaches to the two SEPs and differences might be explained by each kit's underlying orientations to the teaching-learning process.;Findings from these investigations have implications for the design of professional development and for engineering curricula. They highlight the importance of considering teacher beliefs about curriculum implementation and subject matter, as well as the importance of creating curriculum materials that focus teacher attention toward student thinking and the language rich science and engineering practices. Recommendations also include ongoing professional development to allow teachers time to try out and revise pedagogical routines that support the SEPs studied here.
机译:这项研究调查了在革新性课程改革期间特拉华州基础老师可用的个人和课程资源,即他们对基础工程课程的知识,目标和信念以及科学教学材料提供的两种科学和工程实践的教学支持。特拉华州处于K-12 STEM运动的最前沿,率先采用全州基本课程资料来补充现有的科学部门,并且率先采用新的科学标准-下一代科学标准。在教师适应和采用新课程时,他们可以得到哪些支持?为了调查这个问题,我研究了(1)教师对工程学和工程学课程的信念,以及(2)在选定的科学与工程学课程中为教师提供的教学支持。;教师对特拉华州采用科学技术的知识,目标和信念新的基础工程课程采用设计,工程和技术调查的改编版进行了调查(Hong,Purser和&Gardella,2011年; Yaser,Baker,Carpius,Krauss和Roberts,2006年)。此外,三个开放性问题试图揭示对教师知识和工程学的更深层次的理解;他们对与新课程,后勤和可行性相关的个人和系统资源的关注;以及他们对工程教育计划带来的潜在积极影响的信念。使用基于关注的采用模型对教师的关注进行了分析(Hall&Hord,2010)。通过将对工程的幼稚表示法与工程学的三个关键特征进行对比,分析了对工程学的理解,这些特征来自较早的一项研究(Capobianco Diefes-Dux,Mena,&Weller,2011)。将尚未参加新课程的专业培训的人与没有显着差异的人进行比较。几乎所有的基础老师答复者都熟悉工程学,并能够使用一个或多个关键特征对其进行定义。他们重视将工程学纳入基础课程;但是,受过训练和未经训练的老师说,他们对教学没有信心,并且不知道与工程有关的新标准。教师们认为新课程的潜在优势或好处是,有助于提高对科学和数学的理解,是提高职业意识的机会,并可以激发学生的学习动机和动机。大多数教师看到了类似的实施障碍:缺乏教师知识,缺乏时间来学习工程学和如何教授工程学,以及缺乏行政支持。几乎所有人都接受了额外的在职培训,以更多地了解这一新课程。;对五个五年级科学部门进行了检查,以寻求教师教学支持的证据,以支持下一代科学标准所倡导的两种科学与工程实践(SEP)。一个基于两个NGSS SEP的分析框架被开发出来:提出问题,定义问题以及从证据中进行论证。调查结果表明,这些工具包在两种SEP的教学方法上差异很大,并且每种工具包在教学过程中的基本定位都可以解释其差异;这些研究结果对专业发展设计和工程课程都有影响。它们强调了考虑教师对课程实施和主题的信念的重要性,以及创建将教师的注意力集中于学生思维以及语言丰富的科学和工程实践的课程材料的重要性。建议还包括持续的专业发展,以使教师有时间尝试和修改支持在此学习的SEP的教学常规。

著录项

  • 作者

    Grusenmeyer, Linda Huey.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Delaware.;

  • 授予单位 University of Delaware.;
  • 学科 Science education.;Curriculum development.;Pedagogy.
  • 学位 D.Ed.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 195 p.
  • 总页数 195
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号