首页> 外文学位 >From scientific practice to science classrooms: Impact of technological tools on the enactment of 'authentic' inquiry in high school science classrooms.
【24h】

From scientific practice to science classrooms: Impact of technological tools on the enactment of 'authentic' inquiry in high school science classrooms.

机译:从科学实践到科学教室:技术工具对高中科学教室中“真实”询问的制定的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined the complex layers and processes inherent to the development in scientific contexts, and the adoption for teaching in high school science classrooms, of two technological tools: Biology Student Workbench and ChemViz. Participants included key players along the path of development, transformation, and implementation including scientists (8), programmers and developers (4), researchers and teacher educators (4), classroom teachers (6), high school students (30). Data collection included two phases of in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and collected artifacts. Classroom enactments of the tools lacked elements of inquiry and were teacher-centered with prescribed convergent activities. Consequently, students were preoccupied with a focus on content and guided instructions. The "desired" and "actual" realizations of the tools fell on two extremes that reflected the disparity between scientists' and teachers' views on science, inquiry science teaching, and the related roles of the tools. The views of educators and programmers were more closely aligned with teachers' views than with the scientists. Research on the adoption of technological tools for classroom teachers should expand to examine the role of scientists, researchers, and teacher educators as compared to the current narrow focus on teacher knowledge, skills, beliefs, and practices.
机译:这项研究研究了两种技术工具(生物学学生工作台和ChemViz)在科学背景下发展所固有的复杂层次和过程,以及在高中科学教室中采用的教学方法。参与者包括沿发展,转型和实施路径发展的关键参与者,包括科学家(8),程序员和开发人员(4),研究人员和教师教育者(4),课堂教师(6),高中学生(30)。数据收集包括两个阶段的深入访谈,课堂观察和收集的工件。这些工具在课堂上的制定缺乏探究元素,并且以教师为中心进行了预定的融合活动。因此,学生全神贯注于内容和指导性说明。工具的“期望”和“实际”实现有两个极端,这反映了科学家和教师对科学,探究科学教学以及工具的相关作用的看法之间的差异。与科学家的观点相比,教育者和程序员的观点与教师的观点更加一致。与目前对教师知识,技能,信念和实践的狭narrow关注相比,有关对课堂教师采用技术工具的研究应扩大以检验科学家,研究人员和教师教育者的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Waight, Noemi.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Education Secondary.;Education Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 233 p.
  • 总页数 233
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号