首页> 外文学位 >Population and employment distribution and urban spatial structure: An empirical analysis of metropolitan Beijing, China in the post-reform era.
【24h】

Population and employment distribution and urban spatial structure: An empirical analysis of metropolitan Beijing, China in the post-reform era.

机译:人口和就业分布与城市空间结构:改革后中国首都北京的实证分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

From a comparative international perspective, this dissertation explores the spatial distributions of population and employment in the Beijing metropolitan area in the post-reform era. This study aims to extend the literature on urban spatial structure, with special reference to the pattern and process of urban decentralization and restructuring from a developing and transitional economy context, and to offer further understanding of the spatial organization of contemporary urban areas that departs from the North American or European experience.;Beijing is a transition city that has experienced dramatic urban growth and spatial restructuring since the reforms in China, and its experience sheds light on how the urban spatial structure changes within a hybrid of an evolving market economy with a central government that retains significant control. This study focuses on the distribution patterns of population and employment in metropolitan Beijing, and employs more flexible techniques, such as nonparametric analysis, geostatistical techniques and demonstrates more nuanced dynamics than those discussed in previous studies.;Our study finds that the spatial pattern of the Beijing metropolitan area is becoming alike to that of large Western cities in the post-reform era, with the compact urban form in the pre-reform era replaced by a more dispersed and polycentric spatial pattern. The overall trend toward the decentralization and polycentrification of both population and employment is evident in the Beijing metropolitan area since the reforms. However, compared with the decentralization of large Western metropolitan areas, the extent of the decentralization of metropolitan Beijing is quite limited. We show that both people and jobs that moved out of the inner city tend to re-concentrate in the near suburbs adjacent to the central area instead of dispersing throughout the metropolitan area. The rapid growth of the near suburbs has expedited the expansion of the central city, with a larger central agglomeration emerged dominating the whole metropolitan area. In this broad sense, the spatial pattern of the Beijing metropolitan area is still highly centralized, and the tendency toward decentralization at the level of the metropolitan area is questionable. Besides, although both people and jobs have decentralized in the Beijing metropolitan area, jobs tend to more concentrate in the central city, and employment has been shown to be less decentralized than population.;Even though the spatial structure of Beijing is largely characterized by monocentricity, our study does provide the evidence that significant population and employment subcenters have emerged in the suburbs of Beijing. However, the number and size of subcenters are small, and the pattern of the subcenters in metropolitan Beijing is highly related to the planned development scheme of the city, so the polycentricity emerged in the Beijing metropolitan area is very different by nature from that observed in Western cities, and has different origins. Although the common features of spatial pattern and trend broadly analogous to those of Western cities have been observed in post-reform Beijing, the driving forces and the process involved still need be understood with reference to the peculiar Chinese context, and the similar factors that caused the suburbanization in the West have taken their effects on the suburbanization of Beijing in a totally different context.;An interesting finding of our study is the similar distribution patterns of both population and employment in the Beijing metropolitan area, with the coincidence of population and employment subcenters in space. The comparison of the distributions of people and jobs in the Beijing metropolitan area shows that the suburban areas adjacent to the central area are the most balanced with people and jobs, corresponding to the emerged subcenters in the near suburbs. This result might be used to argue that jobs-housing balance occurs as part of the urban development process, and the decentralization of both population and employment in the Beijing metropolitan area from the inner city to the near suburbs has induced jobs-housing balance in the near suburbs. At last, the relationship between jobs-housing balance and urban commuting is tested through regression analysis. The results show that balancing people and jobs by configuring land use patterns seems not quite relevant to shortening commuting durations in our case, so this may suggest that it is more promising to integrate transportation planning and land use planning to address the transportation problems in Beijing.
机译:本文从国际比较的角度探讨了改革后北京都市圈人口与就业的空间分布。这项研究旨在扩展有关城市空间结构的文献,特别是参考发展中和转型经济背景下的城市分权和结构调整的模式和过程,并提供对当代城市区域空间结构的进一步理解。北美或欧洲的经验。北京是自中国改革以来经历了戏剧性的城市增长和空间结构调整的过渡城市,其经验揭示了城市空间结构如何在不断发展的市场经济与中央集权的混合体中发生变化。拥有重大控制权的政府。这项研究着眼于北京大都市地区的人口和就业分布模式,并采用了非参数分析,地统计技术等更灵活的技术,并证明了比以前研究中讨论的更细微的动态变化;改革后的时代,北京都市区与西方大城市越来越相似,改革前的紧凑城市形态被更为分散和多中心的空间格局所取代。改革以来,在北京大都市区,人口和就业都出现了权力下放和多中心化的总体趋势。但是,与西方大城市的权力下放相比,北京的权力下放程度是相当有限的。我们表明,搬出内城的人员和工作都倾向于重新集中在邻近中心区的近郊,而不是分散在整个大都市区。近郊地区的快速增长加快了中心城市的扩张,出现了更大的中心集聚区,主导了整个大都市区。从广义上讲,北京都市圈的空间格局仍然高度集中,在都市圈层面上去中心化的趋势值得怀疑。此外,尽管北京大都市区的人和工作都已分散,但工作往往更多地集中在中心城市,并且事实证明就业比人口分散程度要低;即使北京的空间结构在很大程度上以单中心为特征,我们的研究确实提供了证据,表明北京郊区已经出现了重要的人口和就业子中心。但是,次中心的数量和规模很小,北京大都市的子中心的模式与城市的规划发展计划高度相关,因此北京大都市地区出现的多中心性与自然界中观察到的大不相同。西部城市,并有不同的来历。尽管在改革后的北京已经观察到空间格局和趋势的共同特征与西方城市的特征大致相似,但仍然需要参照中国的特殊情况以及造成这一现象的类似因素来理解其驱动力和过程。西方的郊区化在完全不同的背景下对北京的郊区化产生了影响。;我们研究的一个有趣发现是,北京大都市区的人口和就业分布模式相似,人口和就业同时发生空间中的子中心。通过对北京大都市地区人员和就业分布的比较,可以发现,与中部地区相邻的郊区的人员和就业最为平衡,与附近郊区的新兴副中心相对应。该结果可能被用来说明就业-住房平衡是城市发展过程的一部分,而北京大都市区的人口和就业从内城区到近郊的分散化导致了城市的就业-住房平衡。在郊区附近。最后,通过回归分析检验了就业住房平衡与城市通勤之间的关系。结果表明,在我们的案例中,通过配置土地使用方式来平衡人员和工作似乎与缩短通勤时间并不太相关,因此这可能表明将交通规划与土地使用规划相结合以解决北京的交通问题更有希望。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sun, Tieshan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Southern California.;

  • 授予单位 University of Southern California.;
  • 学科 Sociology Social Structure and Development.;Sociology Demography.;Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 208 p.
  • 总页数 208
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号