首页> 外文学位 >Mass media's agenda setting function in the age of globalization: A multi-national agenda-setting test.
【24h】

Mass media's agenda setting function in the age of globalization: A multi-national agenda-setting test.

机译:全球化时代大众媒体的议程设置功能:多国议程设置测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores mass media's agenda-setting function in a context of increased globalization to determine whether the theory, which was built upon intra-nation environments, functions in the global setting. The study matches public agendas with media agendas to investigate agenda-setting effects in 11 countries worldwide. It also compares media agendas across countries, both at the object level and the attribute level, to consider whether inter-nation intermedia influence exists.;The results suggest a general pattern of the agenda-setting function of mass media in the countries examined. The study finds evidence of inter-nation intermedia influence and thus presents a new way to look at the intermedia agenda-setting relationship -- moving this research from comparisons within a local area to cross-national intermedia comparisons.;Moreover, this study explores for evidence of directional inter-nation intermedia agenda-setting, presuming that the media of the pivotal and powerful West have stronger influence on their non-Western counterparts than vice versa. Due to the lack of evidence found, the study cannot argue a general causality between Western and non-Western countries' media.;Finally, the study examines second level intermedia agenda-setting effect at the global level to determine whether the attribute agendas of the media in different countries are dissimilar. The multi-national investigation did not yield clear-cut results. Findings suggest a complex inter-nation intermedia relationship at the attribute level and imply that, in the age of globalization, a simple "ideological difference" reasoning derived from the Cold War days is probably outdated.
机译:本文在日益全球化的背景下探讨了大众传媒的议程设置功能,以确定建立在国际环境下的理论是否在全球范围内发挥作用。该研究使公共议程与媒体议程相匹配,以调查全球11个国家/地区制定议程的影响。它还在对象级别和属性级别上比较了各国之间的媒体议程,以考虑是否存在国际间的中间媒体影响力。结果表明,在所考察的国家中大众媒体的议程设置功能具有一般模式。该研究发现了国际媒介间影响的证据,因此提出了一种研究媒介间议程设置关系的新方法-将这项研究从本地范围内的比较转移到跨国媒介间的比较。有方向性的国际媒体中间议程设置的证据,假定关键和强大的西方媒体对非西方媒体的影响要强于反西方媒体。由于缺乏证据,该研究无法论证西方和非西方国家媒体之间的普遍因果关系。最后,该研究考察了全球二级媒体中间议程设置的影响,以确定媒体的属性议程是否不同国家/地区的媒体不同。跨国调查没有得出明确的结果。研究结果表明,在属性层面上,国际间的中间关系十分复杂,这意味着在全球化时代,从冷战时代得出的简单的“意识形态差异”推理可能已经过时了。

著录项

  • 作者

    Du, Ying Roselyn.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Journalism.;Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 166 p.
  • 总页数 166
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 新闻学、新闻事业;传播理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号