首页> 外文学位 >Is empathy the missing link in teaching business ethics? A course-based educational intervention with undergraduate business students.
【24h】

Is empathy the missing link in teaching business ethics? A course-based educational intervention with undergraduate business students.

机译:同理心是商业道德教学中缺失的环节吗?针对本科商科学生的基于课程的教育干预。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Past approaches to teaching ethics have been rooted primarily within the cognitive developmental tradition, with the focus on developing moral reasoning. Recent studies in cognitive neuroscience and social psychology have challenged this emphasis, highlighting the primacy of the emotion in driving moral decision-making. This study proposed that empathy may be an appropriate construct for integrating both processes, and that an moral education intervention that focused on empathetic perspective-taking based on Martin Hoffman's work may prove effective in both advancing moral reasoning and empathy. This approach was applied using a quasi-experimental design with undergraduate business students (N = 181) within a semester-long business ethics course. It was predicted that the class section receiving the empathetic perspective-taking intervention would show more growth on both perspective-taking (Interpersonal Reactivity Index, PT subscale) and moral reasoning (Defining Issues Test-2) measures than the comparison groups receiving the principled moral reasoning approach. Results from repeated measures ANOVAs by group indicated statistically significant differences for the comparison group increases on moral reasoning (DIT-2 N2 score); no difference was seen in the intervention group on either moral reasoning or perspective-taking. The results, however, did indicated a significant difference by gender for the intervention group on one of the subscales, Empathetic Concern, with women increasing and men decreasing in empathetic concern. A discussion of the results offers specific suggestions for integrating empathy into business ethics courses, balancing moral reasoning with emotional engagement and addressing issues related to gender. Also, this study suggests the need for skill-based, context specific measures of empathy.
机译:过去的道德教学方法主要植根于认知发展的传统中,重点放在发展道德推理上。认知神经科学和社会心理学方面的最新研究对这一强调提出了挑战,突显了情感在推动道德决策中的重要性。这项研究提出,同理心可能是整合这两个过程的合适结构,基于马丁·霍夫曼的工作而注重同情心观点采择的道德教育干预措施可能会在推进道德推理和同情心方面发挥有效作用。在一个学期的商业道德课程中,该方法是通过准实验设计与本科商科学生(N = 181)一起应用的。预计接受同理心观点采取干预措施的班级组在观点采取(人际反应性指数,PT分量表)和道德推理(定义问题测验-2)方面的表现将比接受原则性道德的对照组有所提高。推理方法。重复测量方差分析的结果表明,比较组的道德推理增加了统计学显着性差异(DIT-2 N2评分);干预组在道德推理或观点采择上均未见差异。然而,结果确实表明,在其中一个量表“共情关怀”上,干预组的性别存在显着差异,女性对共情的关注有所增加,而男性则有所下降。对结果的讨论为将同理心纳入商业道德课程,在道德推理与情感投入之间取得平衡以及解决与性别相关的问题提供了具体建议。同样,这项研究表明需要基于技能的,针对情境的共情测量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Adkins, Christopher P.;

  • 作者单位

    The College of William and Mary.;

  • 授予单位 The College of William and Mary.;
  • 学科 Education Educational Psychology.;Education Business.;Psychology Cognitive.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 166 p.
  • 总页数 166
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号