首页> 外文学位 >A policy comparison of bacterial pollution management at two swimming beaches in Southern California using a joint physical-behavioral-economic simulation analysis.
【24h】

A policy comparison of bacterial pollution management at two swimming beaches in Southern California using a joint physical-behavioral-economic simulation analysis.

机译:使用联合的物理-行为-经济模拟分析,对南加州两个泳滩细菌污染管理的政策比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This work investigates the effectiveness of different forms of management policy implemented to reduce the negative impact of bacterially polluted marine coastal swimming waters on the health and welfare of visitors to two beaches in Orange County, CA as well as to the broader society that pays to implement these management policies. The main drawbacks to current beach management practices in southern California are three-fold: data accuracy is questionable due to the long time delays involved in culture-based testing methods, the timeliness of health risk information delivery is poor chiefly as a consequence of slow testing methods, and compliance with warning information is poorly understood and generally observed to be 50% or less.;Beach management policies under consideration in this analysis are derived from variations in four dimensions of beach management choice: level of gradation in health risk warning information, timeliness of information delivery, type of water quality monitoring test used, and frequency of water quality testing. All of these polices are considered for two beaches in Orange County. Huntington State Beach and Huntington City Beach that together cover a 7.5 km stretch of publicly accessible coastline starting just north of the outlet of the Santa Ana River.;A three-part model of beach visitor behavior is constructed to predict gross daily attendance at each of the two beaches, the fraction of these beach attendees who initially intend to swim in the ocean during their visit, and the likelihood that these visitors will comply with posted health risk warning signs and choose not to swim despite their original (pre-warning) intention. These three dependent variables were estimated on a combination of environmental data collected by established in-situ instrumentation with publicly retrievable telemetry and population-specific behavioral and attitudinal data collected by survey interviewers in the summer of 2005 as part of the present work.;A water quality model was developed in order to provide forecast and nowcast predictions of the concentration of one fecal indicator bacteria group, enterococci. The results of this model were applied to policies that used model predictions either instead or in conjunction with water quality monitoring in order to improve the accuracy of warning information and reduce the costs incurred by the testing itself as well as the negative consequences of faulty information.;A welfare model was constructed to determine the posting status and health risk at the beach sites, then to calculate four outcome metrics using inputs from the behavioral and water quality models. The welfare model factors calculated for each beach site and day are: relative risk, posting status, number of swimmers and number of illnesses. The four outcome metrics determined by the welfare model are: Societal Net Benefit, Personal Net Benefit, Illness Rate, and Risk-Weighted Marginal Cost. A total of 37 policies were derived from variations in the four dimensions of management choice, and these policies were compared using the four calculated outcome metrics.;Overall results of the policy comparison suggest that, as applied to conditions at the two beaches under consideration, a balanced improvement in outcome metrics can be achieved through the following choices in each of the four management dimensions:;Health risk information should be delivered to the public with an additional level of refinement by using a graded three-level warning system rather than a simple binary (safe/not safe) warning; additionally, new advanced tests should be applied that allow results to be returned in as little as three hours despite the additional cost of such tests; these tests should be applied adaptively as water quality varies, with more frequent tests as water quality worsens; finally, the warning information should be supplied only for the current beach day (a nowcast) rather than for the following day as a forecast, which would limit the accuracy of the warning.
机译:这项工作调查了各种形式的管理政策的有效性,这些管理政策的实施旨在减少细菌污染的海洋沿海游泳水域对加利福尼亚州奥兰治县两个海滩以及为实施而付出代价的更广泛社会的游客的健康和福祉的负面影响这些管理政策。当前在加利福尼亚南部的海滩管理实践的主要弊端有三方面:由于基于文化的测试方法所涉及的长时间延迟,数据准确性令人怀疑;主要由于测试缓慢,健康风险信息的及时性差方法和对警告信息的依从性了解甚少,并且通常观察到不超过50%。;此分析中考虑的海滩管理政策源自海滩管理选择四个维度的变化:健康风险警告信息的等级,信息发布的及时性,所使用的水质监测测试的类型以及水质测试的频率。所有这些警察都考虑在奥兰治县的两个海滩使用。亨廷顿州立海滩和亨廷顿市海滩一起覆盖了7.5公里的公共海岸线,从圣安娜河出水口开始向北延伸;建立了一个由三部分组成的海滩游客行为模型,以预测每个海滩每天的总游客量这两个海滩,这些海滩参与者最初打算在访问期间在海洋中游泳的比例,以及这些访问者将遵守张贴的健康风险警告标志并选择不游泳的可能性,尽管他们的初衷(警告) 。这三个因变量是根据已建立的现场仪器与可公开获取的遥测技术收集的环境数据以及调查访问员于2005年夏季收集的特定于人群的行为和态度数据进行估算的,这是本工作的一部分。建立质量模型是为了提供一种粪便指示菌肠球菌浓度的预测和现时预测。该模型的结果被应用于替代模型或与水质监测结合使用模型预测的策略,以提高警告信息的准确性并减少测试本身产生的成本以及错误信息的负面影响。 ;建立了福利模型来确定海滩站点的张贴状态和健康风险,然后使用行为模型和水质模型的输入来计算四个结果指标。为每个海滩站点和一天计算的福利模型因素是:相对风险,张贴状态,游泳者数量和疾病数量。福利模型确定的四个结果指标是:社会净收益,个人净收益,疾病率和风险加权边际成本。共有37项政策是从管理选择的四个维度的变化中得出的,并使用四个计算出的结果指标对这些政策进行了比较。;该政策比较的总体结果表明,考虑到所考虑的两个海滩的情况,通过在四个管理维度中的每个方面进行以下选择,可以实现成果指标的均衡改进:通过使用分级三级警告系统而不是简单的方法,应将健康风险信息以更完善的方式提供给公众二进制(安全/不安全)警告;此外,应采用新的高级测试,以使测试结果可在短短三个小时内返回,尽管此类测试会产生额外费用;这些测试应随水质变化而适应性地应用,随着水质恶化,应更频繁地进行测试;最后,警告信息应仅提供给当前海滩日(临近预报),而不应提供给第二天作为预报,因为这会限制警告的准确性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Warren, Justin E.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Public Health.;Environmental Sciences.;Recreation.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 184 p.
  • 总页数 184
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号