首页> 外文学位 >Enhancing Seismic Performance of Tall Buildings by Optimal Design of Supplemental Energy-Dissipation Devices
【24h】

Enhancing Seismic Performance of Tall Buildings by Optimal Design of Supplemental Energy-Dissipation Devices

机译:通过辅助耗能设备的优化设计提高高层建筑的抗震性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation focuses on the use of supplemental energy-dissipation devices to improve the seismic performance of tall steel buildings. It is divided into two parts. Part 1 focuses on exploring cost-effective retrofit strategies to improve the seismic performance of an existing tall building. The selected building is a 35-story steel moment-resisting frame, with representative details from the early 1970s. Detailed seismic evaluations were conducted in the framework of Performance Based Earthquake Engineering (PBEE), using the scenario-based performance assessment methods. A three-dimensional numerical model capturing the mechanical properties of the most critical structural elements was generated using the program: Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees). Seismic evaluation of the selected building was done following ASCE 41-13, FEMA 351 and FEMA P-58, and two hazard levels: basic safety earthquake levels 1 and 2 (BSE-1E and BSE-2E) prescribed by ASCE 41 were used for the assessment. Results predicted that this building failed to meet the recommended performance objectives and had a variety of seismic vulnerabilities, and possible retrofits were needed.;Therefore, a two-level retrofit approach was examined that focused on achieving the collapse prevention limit state under the BSE-2E hazard level. In Level-1, the brittle column splices were fixed everywhere in the building, and the massive concrete cladding was replaced with lightweight substitute in the exterior of the building. Level-2 strategies augmented the Level-1 methods by adding different supplemental energy-dissipation devices. Devices investigated include: fluid viscous dampers (FVDs), viscous wall dampers (VWDs) and buckling restrained braces (BRBs). Among these, the scheme that used FVDs was expected to be the most promising to upgrade the seismic performance of the case-study steel moment frame, and thus was examined first. In this approach, feasible damper locations and overall effective damping ratios were evaluated through a series of preliminary studies, and then a two-phase manual design method was used to refine the distribution and mechanical properties of the dampers. Thorough assessments of the refined design were carried out and the results indicated that the proposed retrofit method of using FVDs could achieve the retrofit goal and provide a cost-effective means of improving the structural behavior and reducing economic losses in a major seismic event for this case-study building.;The study was extended to examine alternative measures to upgrade the case-study building by using either VWDs or BRBs, and compared their relative effectiveness and economy with the scheme using FVDs. The locations and effective damping ratios were kept the same for all three schemes to insure a valid comparison. Results indicated that the proposed schemes of VWDs and BRBs both failed to achieve the targeted performance goal for this structure under a BSE-2E event, and special design considerations were required.;Part 2 of the dissertation focuses on developing an automated tool to streamline the design of FVDs in tall buildings. Aided by the high-performance computers and parallel processors, a large amount of complicated nonlinear response history analysis was conducted to facilitate the automate design procedure. The optimization problem was devised in a simplified PBEE framework under one hazard level each time. Basic optimization ingredients were selected to reflect the target performance goal, and several cases using different objective functions were evaluated.;Two tall buildings: the existing steel moment frame examined before and a newly-designed mega-brace steel frame were selected to rely on the automated procedure to optimally design FVDs. In both cases, the automated procedure turned to be very efficient, help identify design parameters of dampers in selected locations and reduce a great amount of engineering efforts. With only limited number of iterations, optimal design patterns of FVDs in a tall building could be found, which were able to improve the structural performance under different hazard events. The suggested optimal design could meet retrofit goal for the existing tall building, as well as achieve enhanced performance goal for both existing and new tall buildings.
机译:本文的重点是使用辅助耗能装置来改善高层钢结构的抗震性能。它分为两个部分。第1部分着重探讨提高成本效益的改造策略,以改善现有高层建筑的抗震性能。选定的建筑物是一幢35层高的钢制抗弯框架,其代表性细节来自1970年代初期。使用基于情景的性能评估方法,在基于性能的地震工程(PBEE)框架内进行了详细的地震评估。使用以下程序生成了捕获最关键的结构元件的机械性能的三维数值模型:地震工程仿真开放系统(OpenSees)。根据ASCE 41-13,FEMA 351和FEMA P-58对选定建筑物进行了地震评估,并采用了两个危害等级:ASCE 41规定的基本安全地震等级1和2(BSE-1E和BSE-2E)用于评估。结果预测该建筑物不能满足建议的性能目标,并且存在多种地震脆弱性,需要进行可能的改造。因此,我们研究了一种两级改造方法,重点是达到BSE下的防塌极限状态- 2E危险等级。在Level-1中,脆性柱接头固定在建筑物的各处,并且在建筑物的外部用轻质替代物代替了庞大的混凝土外墙。 2级策略通过添加不同的辅助耗能设备来增强1级方法。研究的设备包括:流体粘性阻尼器(FVD),粘性壁阻尼器(VWD)和屈曲约束支撑(BRB)。在这些方法中,使用FVD的方案被认为是最有前途的,以提高案例研究钢矩框架的抗震性能,因此首先进行了研究。在这种方法中,通过一系列初步研究评估了可行的阻尼器位置和总体有效阻尼比,然后使用两阶段的手动设计方法来完善阻尼器的分布和机械性能。对改进的设计进行了全面的评估,结果表明,使用FVD的拟议改造方法可以实现改造目标,并为这种情况下的重大地震事件提供了一种经济有效的方式来改善结构性能并减少经济损失研究范围;该研究扩展到研究使用VWD或BRB升级案例研究建筑物的替代措施,并将其相对有效性和经济性与使用FVD的方案进行比较。所有三种方案的位置和有效阻尼比均保持相同,以确保进行有效的比较。结果表明,在BSE-2E事件下,建议的VWD和BRB方案均未达到该结构的目标性能目标,并且需要特殊的设计考虑。论文的第二部分着重于开发一种自动化工具以简化高层建筑中的FVD设计。在高性能计算机和并行处理器的辅助下,进行了大量复杂的非线性响应历史分析,以促进自动化设计过程。每次在一个危害级别下,在简化的PBEE框架中设计了优化问题。选择基本的优化成分以反映目标性能目标,并对使用不同目标函数的几种情况进行了评估。;两座高层建筑:之前检查过的现有钢制矩型框架和新设计的巨型支撑型钢制框架均以此为依据。自动化程序以最佳设计FVD。在这两种情况下,自动化程序都非常有效,可帮助在选定位置识别风门的设计参数,并减少大量工程工作。仅需有限的迭代次数,就可以找到高层建筑中FVD的最佳设计模式,从而能够改善不同灾害事件下的结构性能。建议的最佳设计可以满足现有高层建筑的改造目标,并可以为现有和新建高层建筑实现更高的性能目标。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Shanshan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Civil engineering.;Engineering.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 283 p.
  • 总页数 283
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号