首页> 外文学位 >A multi-domain analysis framework for product development: The 'mediating links' of data, information, and knowledge in complex engineered product systems.
【24h】

A multi-domain analysis framework for product development: The 'mediating links' of data, information, and knowledge in complex engineered product systems.

机译:产品开发的多领域分析框架:复杂的工程产品系统中数据,信息和知识的“中介链接”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The 21st century brings many new challenges in product development (PD) mainly due to a drastic increase in the scale and complexity of engineered systems. These large complex systems require the collaboration of functionally and geographically distributed resources within and outside organizational boundaries. These distributed resources present many communication, coordination, and integration problems and risks, which impede successful product development.;There are differences among researchers in not only the methodology used and assumptions made but also in the perception of how product development is executed. This lack of agreement is furthermore reflected in the diversity of organizations developing products. Consequently, it is difficult to develop a single theory amidst such differences. However, there seems to be a consensus in PD literature in identifying the three key domains of product development: people, processes/tasks, and product. The three domains are strongly related and glued together through various dependencies. After all, the development organization is executing the development process, which is implementing the product architecture. There is ample anecdotal evidence suggesting the existence of such relationships and possible 'misalignment' (or discrepancy) between them. However, there is no tool or theory that systematically links these domains together in a way that can help understand the interaction within and among these domains and how they impact overall product development activities and risks.;In order to provide discipline and transparency into the complex dynamics inherent in a distributed PD environment, this research proposes a novel network-based framework for enterprise-wide PD management. The approach taken in this research represents each domain as a network of interacting elements and the exchanges between the domains as the transformations of data, information, and knowledge. Knowledge creation is at the heart of product development. We propose that the product development process can be represented as a sequential progression: Data ⇒ Information ⇒ Knowledge ⇒ Product. This progression is due to the many activities amongst the developers and designers as they address requirements and challenges during the PD endeavor. Adopting a framework that considers data, information, and knowledge as entities that are acquired, created, and used within an organization, provide a unique perspective into the dynamic behavior of the PD system.;In this research, we investigate these three domains by proposing and examining the interrelationships among them to explain why and through what mechanism they relate to the PD system behavior. There is no description of their interactions and relationships that provides insight into why these relationships where intentionally designed or how they may have evolved overtime in order to deliver a particular product. This is an important description missing from PD research. We have modeled the exchanges (interactions and interdependencies) among the three key PD domains. We have demonstrated a procedure by which the interaction between the team networks and the process/task networks may influence the creation/formation of a product architecture network. Additionally, we have defined various metrics to quantify the PD risks in terms of network and domain relationships.;A comprehensive analysis and depiction of these relationships can help improve our understanding of how the connectivity of these domains impacts or drives one another. A better understanding of these interdependencies will also provide new insights into ways of managing the domains, ultimately resulting in improved development efforts and the associated products.
机译:21世纪在产品开发(PD)中带来了许多新的挑战,这主要是由于工程系统的规模和复杂性急剧增加。这些大型的复杂系统需要在组织边界内外的功能和地理上分布的资源进行协作。这些分散的资源带来了许多沟通,协调和集成问题和风险,这阻碍了产品开发的成功。研究人员之间不仅在所使用的方法和所做的假设上存在差异,而且在产品开发的执行方式上也存在差异。缺乏共识还反映在开发产品的组织的多样性中。因此,在这种差异中很难发展出单一的理论。但是,PD文献似乎在确定产品开发的三个关键领域(人员,流程/任务和产品)方面达成了共识。这三个领域密切相关,并通过各种依赖关系粘合在一起。毕竟,开发组织正在执行开发过程,该过程正在实现产品体系结构。有大量的轶事证据表明这种关系的存在以及它们之间可能的“错位”(或差异)。但是,没有工具或理论可以将这些领域系统地链接在一起,从而可以帮助理解这些领域内部和之间的相互作用以及它们如何影响整个产品开发活动和风险。分布式PD环境中固有的动态特性,这项研究提出了一种基于网络的新颖的企业范围PD管理框架。本研究中采用的方法将每个域表示为交互元素的网络,并将域之间的交换表示为数据,信息和知识的转换。知识创造是产品开发的核心。我们建议产品开发过程可以表示为一个顺序的过程:数据⇒信息⇒知识⇒产品。之所以如此进步,是由于开发人员和设计人员在PD努力中解决需求和挑战时进行了许多活动。采用一个将数据,信息和知识视为在组织内获取,创建和使用的实体的框架,从而提供了对PD系统动态行为的独特视角。在本研究中,我们通过提出以下三个方面来研究并检查它们之间的相互关系,以解释它们为什么以及通过什么机制与PD系统行为相关。没有对它们之间的相互作用和关系的描述,可以深入了解为什么有意设计了这些关系,或者它们可能如何随着时间的推移发展以交付特定产品。这是PD研究中缺少的重要描述。我们已经建模了三个关键PD域之间的交换(交互作用和相互依赖性)。我们已经演示了一个过程,团队网络和流程/任务网络之间的交互可能会影响产品体系结构网络的创建/形成。此外,我们定义了各种度量标准,以根据网络和域之间的关系来量化PD风险。对这些关系的全面分析和描述可以帮助我们更好地理解这些域的连通性如何相互影响或相互驱动。对这些相互依赖性的更好理解还将为管理域的方式提供新的见解,最终导致改进开发工作和相关产品。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bradley, Joe A.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Business Administration General.;Engineering System Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 244 p.
  • 总页数 244
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号