首页> 外文学位 >A sensitivity analysis of the lifecycle and global land use change greenhouse gas emissions of U.S. corn ethanol fuel.
【24h】

A sensitivity analysis of the lifecycle and global land use change greenhouse gas emissions of U.S. corn ethanol fuel.

机译:对生命周期和全球土地利用的敏感性分析改变了美国玉米乙醇燃料的温室气体排放量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent studies argue that corn ethanol fuel is becoming more sustainable and has less direct lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than previously estimated (Wang, Wu and Huo, 2007; Kim and Dale, 2008; Liska et al., 2008). In the U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (U.S. EISA) corn ethanol fuel produced from new facilities are required to have at least 20% less GHG emissions than conventional gasoline. However, it also specifies that the GHG emissions from global land use changes should be considered when assessing corn ethanol fuel emissions. Global land use change emissions from increased U.S. corn ethanol production therefore play a crucial role in determining whether this renewable fuel can meet the U.S. EISA requirement.;This study examines the range of overall GHG emissions of U.S. corn ethanol fuel when the direct lifecycle and global land use change emissions are estimated using various data and assumptions. The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model by Wang (1996) is used to determine the direct lifecycle emissions of corn ethanol. These emissions are calculated using recent data on energy and chemical input usage during corn farming from Liska et al. (2008) and using new energy use and yield assumptions during ethanol production from selected studies (Wu, 2008; Liska et al., 2008; Christianson, 2008; Perrin, Fretes and Sesmero, 2009).;The global land use change emissions are generated using the Land Use Change Emissions (LUCE) module. These emissions are calculated using the land use carbon emission factors and the global land use change data. The global land use change data is based on the simulation results of a special version of the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model (Hertel, 1997) by Taheripour, Hertel, and Tyner (2008) for several assumed increases in U.S. ethanol production and trade restrictions scenarios. The land use carbon emissions factors are the estimated GHG emissions incurred for each year of ethanol consumption when a hectare of forest or grassland undergo cropland conversion. These factors are calculated using the Woods Hole and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) land carbon data and using different assumptions on soil and vegetation carbon losses during cropland conversion, wood product decay and duration of ethanol consumption.;The results show that the direct lifecycle GHG emissions of corn ethanol fuel can exceed the 20% GHG reduction requirement in the U.S. EISA given the new data and assumptions during corn farming and ethanol production. However, the overall GHG emissions of corn ethanol are considerably higher due to global land use change emissions. Global land use change emissions rise with greater soil and vegetation carbon loss assumptions and when wood product decay is considered. A longer duration of ethanol consumption reduces the global land use change emissions since these emissions are distributed over a longer time period. The findings of this study indicate that it is highly uncertain if corn ethanol fuel has less GHG emissions than conventional gasoline when global land use change emissions are considered. It is possible to argue that corn ethanol fuel has more GHG emissions than conventional gasoline by increasing the soil and vegetation carbon loss assumptions, shortening the duration of ethanol consumption and using the estimates of corn ethanol direct lifecycle emissions based on previous corn farming and ethanol production data. Likewise, it is possible to conclude that corn ethanol can satisfy the 20% GHG reduction requirement in the U.S. EISA by adopting conservative assumptions on soil and vegetation carbon losses, lengthening the duration of ethanol consumption and adopting corn ethanol direct lifecycle emissions estimated using recent corn farming and ethanol production data.
机译:最近的研究认为,玉米乙醇燃料变得比以前估计的更具可持续性,并且生命周期中的直接温室气体排放量比以前估计的要少(Wang,Wu和Huo,2007; Kim和Dale,2008; Liska等,2008)。根据2007年《美国能源独立与安全法》(美国EISA),新工厂生产的玉米乙醇燃料的温室气体排放量必须比常规汽油至少少20%。但是,它也明确指出,在评估玉米乙醇燃料排放时,应考虑全球土地利用变化带来的温室气体排放。因此,美国玉米乙醇产量增加带来的全球土地利用变化排放在确定这种可再生燃料是否能够满足美国EISA要求方面起着至关重要的作用。本研究研究了直接生命周期和全球生命周期中美国玉米乙醇燃料总体温室气体排放量的范围。土地使用变化排放量是使用各种数据和假设估算的。 Wang(1996)的温室气体,管制排放和运输中的能源使用(GREET)模型用于确定玉米乙醇的直接生命周期排放。这些排放量是根据Liska等人在玉米种植过程中使用的能源和化学投入的最新数据计算得出的。 (2008年),并从某些研究中使用乙醇生产过程中的新能源使用和产量假设(Wu,2008; Liska等,2008; Christianson,2008; Perrin,Fretes和Sesmero,2009)。使用土地使用变化排放量(LUCE)模块生成。这些排放量是使用土地使用碳排放因子和全球土地使用变化数据计算得出的。全球土地利用变化数据是基于Taheripour,Hertel和Tyner(2008)的特殊版本的全球贸易分析项目(GTAP)模型(Hertel,1997)的模拟结果得出的,该假设是美国乙醇产量和产量的若干假设增长。贸易限制方案。土地使用碳排放因子是当一片森林或草地进行耕地转换时,每年乙醇消费产生的估计温室气体排放量。这些因素是根据伍兹霍尔(Woods Hole)和政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)的土地碳数据以及对农田转换过程中土壤和植被碳损失,木材产品腐烂和乙醇消费持续时间的不同假设计算得出的。考虑到玉米种植和乙醇生产过程中的新数据和假设,直接生命周期中玉米乙醇燃料的温室气体排放量可能超过美国EISA中20%的温室气体减排要求。但是,由于全球土地用途变化的排放,玉米乙醇的总体温室气体排放量要高得多。随着更大的土壤和植被碳损失假设以及考虑到木制品腐烂,全球土地利用变化排放量会增加。较长时间的乙醇消耗减少了全球土地使用变化的排放,因为这些排放分布在更长的时间段内。这项研究的结果表明,当考虑到全球土地利用变化的排放量时,玉米乙醇燃料的温室气体排放量是否低于传统汽油,这是高度不确定的。可以通过增加土壤和植被碳损失假设,缩短乙醇消耗的持续时间以及使用基于以前的玉米种植和乙醇生产的玉米乙醇直接生命周期排放量估算值来证明玉米乙醇燃料比常规汽油具有更多的温室气体排放量数据。同样,通过对土壤和植被碳损失的保守假设,延长乙醇消费的持续时间以及采用最近玉米估算的玉米乙醇直接生命周期排放量,可以得出结论,玉米乙醇可以满足美国EISA中20%的温室气体减排要求。农业和乙醇生产数据。

著录项

  • 作者

    Baldos, Uris Lantz Caldo.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.;Environmental Sciences.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 126 p.
  • 总页数 126
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号