首页> 外文学位 >A comparative analysis of word problems in selected United States and Russian first grade textbooks.
【24h】

A comparative analysis of word problems in selected United States and Russian first grade textbooks.

机译:对美国和俄罗斯一年级精选教材中单词问题的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to explore word problems as a subject matter in mathematics textbook curricula. The motivation for the study derived from the following evidence: (a) American students find some word problems are more difficult than others (Garcia, Jimenez, & Hess, 2006; Riley & Green, 1988; Stern, 2001), and (b) one of the possible mediators in students' word problem-solving performances is a limited exposure to some types of problems due to content characteristics of arithmetic textbooks (Cai & Watanabe, 2002; Fujita & Jones, 2003; Haggarty & Pepin, 2003; Tomroos, 2004).;An enriched classification of word problems (Grishchenko, 2008) was used to compare word problems across several American and Russian textbook series. Changes in first-grade word problem curricula that occurred over the last 20 years (i.e., since research conducted by Stigler et al., 1986) were identified.;Analysis revealed a diversity of word problems existing in both U.S. and Russian textbooks. The texts differ in number of problems and problem distribution across each category. Although U.S. textbooks may differ in appearance and organization, most of them are similar in their word problem curricula; i.e., in word problem distribution within the content and number of problems, which has more than doubled in the past 20 years. Russian textbooks contain more word problems (both in quantity and in variety) than American books.;This research provides insight into the word problem topic in U.S. textbooks and contributes to the research base on addition/subtraction word problem teaching and learning. It also illuminates the critical need to create equal opportunities in arithmetic word problem solving for all students.
机译:这项研究的目的是探讨数学教材课程中作为主题的单词问题。该研究的动机来自以下证据:(a)美国学生发现某些单词问题比其他单词问题更难解决(Garcia,Jimenez和Hess,2006; Riley和Green,1988; Stern,2001),以及(b)由于算术教科书的内容特点,学生解决单词问题的能力可能是调解者有限地接触某些类型的问题(Cai&Watanabe,2002; Fujita&Jones,2003; Haggarty&Pepin,2003; Tomroos, 2004);;丰富的单词问题分类(Grishchenko,2008)被用来比较美国和俄罗斯教科书系列中的单词问题。确定了过去20年(即自Stigler等人进行的研究以来,1986年)发生的一年级单词问题课程的变化;分析表明,美国和俄罗斯教科书中都存在各种各样的单词问题。案文在每个类别中的问题数量和问题分布都不同。尽管美国教科书的外观和组织形式可能有所不同,但大多数教科书在单词问题课程上都相似;也就是说,在单词问题中,问题的内容和数量的分布在过去20年中增加了一倍以上。俄语教科书包含的单词问题(无论数量还是种类)都比美国书籍多。这也说明了为所有学生在解决算术单词问题中创造平等机会的迫切需求。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 Education Mathematics.;Education Elementary.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 170 p.
  • 总页数 170
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号