首页> 外文学位 >Other grounds: Popular genres and the rhetoric of anthropology, 1900--1940.
【24h】

Other grounds: Popular genres and the rhetoric of anthropology, 1900--1940.

机译:其他依据:流行类型和人类学修辞学,1900--1940年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Other Grounds: Popular Genres and the Rhetoric of Anthropology, 1900-1940, examines how gender, race, and genre interact in a discipline's bid for scientific status. As anthropology professionalized early in the twentieth century, the ethnographic monograph became the primary site for legitimate scientific knowledge, and many practitioners---especially women and Native Americans---found their concerns and knowledge practices marginalized. These marginalized professionals responded creatively to the monograph's ascendance by developing alternative genres flexible and capacious enough to accommodate their intellectual and rhetorical goals. This study recovers a proliferation of alternative genres, including field autobiographies, folklore collections, and ethnographic novels, that rhetors created in the early twentieth century to access rhetorical resources unavailable in the discipline's privileged forms. I demonstrate that marginalized practitioners, including Gladys Reichard, Ruth Underhill, Ann Axtell Morris, Frank Applegate, Luther Standing Bear, and others, used these hybrid genres to influence professional practice and to intervene in broader debates taking place outside professional boundaries---debates, for instance, over indigenous land rights and federal Indian education policy. For scholars in rhetoric, this project offers a critical vocabulary for analyzing spatial-rhetorical practices, by (1) connecting contemporary genre theory with studies of spatial rhetorics, (2) analyzing a range of spatial tropes and topoi, and (3) introducing for critical use such terms as rhetorical scarcity, rhetorical trajectories, and rhetorical recruitment. Ultimately, this project critiques the power of spatial representations to naturalize relations of domination, and recovers inventive rhetorical strategies that use spatial representations to call for---and create---knowledge that demands ethical response and action.
机译:其他背景:流行类型和人类学修辞学,1900-1940年,研究了性别,种族和体裁如何相互作用以寻求一门学科的科学地位。随着人类学在二十世纪初开始专业化,民族志专着成为合法科学知识的主要发源地,许多从业者(尤其是女性和美洲原住民)发现他们的关注和知识实践被边缘化了。这些边缘化的专业人员通过发展足够灵活,足够适应他们的智力和修辞目标的替代体裁,创造性地回应了专着的上升。这项研究恢复了另类流派的泛滥,其中包括田野自传,民俗收藏和民族志小说,这些流派是二十世纪初期修辞者创造的,以获取该学科特权形式无法获得的修辞资源。我证明了边缘化的从业者,包括Gladys Reichard,Ruth Underhill,Ann Axtell Morris,Frank Applegate,Luther Standing Bear等人,都使用这些混合体裁来影响专业实践并干预在专业界外进行的更广泛的辩论---辩论例如关于土著土地权利和印度联邦教育政策。对于修辞学的学者而言,该项目为分析空间修辞实践提供了重要的词汇,方法是:(1)将当代体裁理论与空间修辞学联系起来,(2)分析一系列空间比喻和拓扑,以及(3)介绍关键用法,例如修辞稀缺,修辞轨迹和修辞招募。最终,该项目批判了空间表征使统治关系自然化的力量,并恢复了使用空间表征来呼吁(并创造)需要道德回应和行动的知识的创造性修辞策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Applegarth, Risa.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Cultural.;Language Rhetoric and Composition.;Womens Studies.;History of Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 307 p.
  • 总页数 307
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 人类学;社会学;自然科学史;语言学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号