首页> 外文学位 >Forging the Detroit Consensus: The relative power cycle and the political economy of the North American automotive trade regime.
【24h】

Forging the Detroit Consensus: The relative power cycle and the political economy of the North American automotive trade regime.

机译:打造底特律共识:北美汽车贸易体制的相对动力循环和政治经济学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study addresses the political economy of firm-state relations in the North American automotive industry from 1960 to 1994, when the governments of the United States, Canada, and eventually Mexico negotiated a series of three managed trade arrangements to govern the continental integration of automobile production: the 1965 Auto Pact between the United States and Canada the 1989 Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement and the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement. During each negotiation, the General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company, and Chrysler Corporation adopted a joint position (Detroit Consensus) that was ultimately reflected in the details of the agreements negotiated by the governments.Following a review of contending theories of firm-state relations in economics, political science, business studies, and international relations, the study focuses on five authors whose work is used to form hypotheses about how firms and states should interact during the three negotiations and periods in between. Attention is given to the political roles of independent automotive suppliers, European and Asian automakers, and organized labor. At the heart of the study is the question: why did the firms form a Detroit Consensus position for each negotiation? Additionally, what do the firms' choices tell us about the power relations between them and these states and other firms?For hypotheses based on four of the five authors, this study finds contradictory evidence. Specifically, while these authors posited structural dominance of either firms or states as a permanent feature of these relationships, in practice the pattern of dominant influence shifted over time. The fifth model of a dynamic cycle of relative power is found to provide the best explanation for this variation, with changes in the automotive trade regime coinciding with a Detroit Consensus for specific changes that sought to limit the loss of U.S. market share of General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler.
机译:这项研究研究了1960年至1994年北美汽车工业中公司与国家之间关系的政治经济学,当时美国,加拿大和最终墨西哥政府就一系列三项有管理的贸易安排进行了谈判,以管理汽车在大陆的整合生产:1965年《美国和加拿大之间的汽车公约》,1989年的《加拿大-美国自由贸易协定》和1994年的《北美自由贸易协定》。在每次谈判中,通用汽车公司,福特汽车公司和克莱斯勒公司都采取了联合立场(底特律共识),这最终反映在政府谈判达成的协议的细节中。在经济学,政治学,商业研究和国际关系方面,该研究集中于五位作者,他们的工作用于形成关于企业和国家在三个谈判期间以及之间的谈判中应如何相互作用的假设。注意独立汽车供应商,欧洲和亚洲汽车制造商以及有组织的劳动者的政治角色。研究的核心是一个问题:为什么企业在每次谈判中都形成底特律共识立场?此外,企业的选择如何告诉我们它们与这些国家和其他企业之间的权力关系?对于基于五位作者中四位作者的假设,本研究发现了相互矛盾的证据。具体来说,尽管这些作者将企业或州的结构优势假定为这些关系的永久特征,但实际上,主导影响的模式随时间而变化。人们发现,相对功率动态循环的第五种模型可以为这种变化提供最好的解释,汽车贸易制度的变化与底特律共识的某些变化相吻合,这些变化旨在限制通用汽车在美国市场份额的损失,福特和克莱斯勒。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sands, Christopher M.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 American Studies.Economics History.Political Science International Relations.Canadian Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 358 p.
  • 总页数 358
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号