首页> 外文学位 >Analyzing the Criminal Justice and Military Models of Counterterrorism: Evidence from the United States.
【24h】

Analyzing the Criminal Justice and Military Models of Counterterrorism: Evidence from the United States.

机译:分析刑事司法和反恐军事模式:来自美国的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

States' counterterrorism strategies have been categorized into the criminal justice and military models of counterterrorism. Currently, the international relations literature lacks a systematic exploration or theorization of these models, and relies mainly on broad conceptualizations and piecemeal evidence to make claims in reference to these two counterterrorism models.;This dissertation examines the conceptual literature on the criminal justice and military models of counterterrorism, further theorizes these models, and empirically analyzes both quantitatively and qualitatively using evidence from the United States. Using data from the Global Terrorism Database and Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, spanning from 1970 to 2014, the quantitative analysis looks predominantly at the military model of counterterrorism in order to determine its relationship with terrorism and relevant domestic political processes. The qualitative analysis, comprised mainly of legal content analysis of the same temporal frame, investigates the conditions under which the models are employed, focusing especially on the criminal justice model. The findings suggest that criminal justice responses are employed mainly against perpetrators from Western nations and U.S. allies, while military responses are disproportionately used against Muslim individuals, especially those affiliated with al-Qaeda, Taliban, and al Shabab. The findings also suggest that both models have been equally employed before and after 9/11, calling into question claims from recent literature suggesting that military counterterrorism policy is a post-9/11 phenomenon. Finally, the results indicate that terrorism both directly and indirectly impacts military activity in the U.S. and, contrarily, that military activity is associated with increases in future supplies of terrorism. This suggests that military action alone may not be enough to combat terrorism.
机译:各国的反恐战略已分为刑事司法和反恐军事模式。当前,国际关系文献对这些模型缺乏系统的探索或理论化,主要依靠广泛的概念和零碎证据来对这两种反恐模型进行主张。反恐理论,进一步对这些模型进行理论化分析,并使用美国的证据进行定量和定性的经验分析。利用1970年至2014年全球恐怖主义数据库和斯德哥尔摩国际和平研究所的数据,定量分析主要着眼于反恐的军事模式,以确定其与恐怖主义和相关国内政治进程的关系。定性分析主要包括对同一时间框架的法律内容分析,它研究了采用该模型的条件,尤其是刑事司法模型。研究结果表明,刑事司法对策主要针对西方国家和美国盟国的肇事者,而军事对策则特别针对穆斯林个人,尤其是与基地组织,塔利班和青年党有关联的穆斯林。研究结果还表明,两种模型在9/11之前和之后均被同等使用,这引起了最近文献的质疑,这些证据表明军事反恐政策是9/11之后的现象。最后,结果表明,恐怖主义直接或间接地影响了美国的军事活动,相反,军事活动与未来恐怖主义供应的增加有关。这表明仅靠军事行动可能还不足以打击恐怖主义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carter, Brittnee.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 International relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 165 p.
  • 总页数 165
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号