首页> 外文学位 >Using a Global Position System to Track Selected Physical Demands of NCAA Division I Football Players During Games
【24h】

Using a Global Position System to Track Selected Physical Demands of NCAA Division I Football Players During Games

机译:使用全球排名系统跟踪NCAA I级足球运动员在比赛中的部分身体需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare differences in distance traveled, maximum velocity, accelerations,;decelerations, and high intensity change of directions in Division I football players. METHODS:;Twenty-one Division I football players, ages 18-24, wore global positioning system (GPSs).;monitors during games to track selected variables of each athlete. Athletes were grouped by.;similarities in playing position in the following manner; wide receiver (WR) and defensive back.;(DB), and offensive linemen (OL) and defensive linemen (DL). Parameters measured were total.;distance covered, maximum velocity, total inertial movement analysis (IMA) (movements >3.5.;m/s2), distances traveled in deceleration and acceleration using two velocity categories for each.;(Deceleraton band 1=3-10m/s2 Deceleration band 2=2-3m/s2, Acceleration band 7=2-3m/s2, and.;Acceleration band 8=3-10m/s2). Inclusion criteria included that athletes must have participated in.;70% of the total plays during the games selected. A Oneway ANOVA analysis with 95%.;confidence interval for means was used to determine differences (p<.05) among groups. Newman.;Keuls post hoc tests were used to determine mean differences. RESULTS: The results of The.;present study indicated that DBs scored significantly (p<0.05) higher in total distance covered,;total IMA, deceleration and acceleration in both Band 1 and Band 2 than WRs. There was no.;significant difference between DBs and WRs in maximum velocity. DL scored significantly higher.;in maximum velocity, deceleration and acceleration Band 1 than OL. There were no significant.;differences between DL and OL in total distance covered, total IMA, and deceleration and.;acceleration Band 2. CONCLUSION: DBs and DL travel further, average higher maximum.;velocities, and accrue more high intensity, explosive movements throughout a game than WRs and.;OL.This study provides quantification of positional physical demands and comparisons of.;collegiate football games and could be used to develop position specific training programs to better.;prepare athletes for play.
机译:目的:比较I类足球运动员的行进距离,最大速度,加速度,减速度和高强度方向变化的差异。方法:21名I-24岁的18岁至24岁的足球运动员佩戴了全球定位系统(GPS)。运动员按以下方式按比赛位置的相似性分组:宽接收器(WR)和防守后卫。(DB),进攻后卫(OL)和防守后卫(DL)。测得的参数是总的;所覆盖的距离,最大速度,总惯性运动分析(IMA)(运动> 3.5。; m / s2),在减速和加速中使用两种速度类别分别行进的距离;(减速带1 = 3 -10m / s2减速带2 = 2-3m / s2,加速带7 = 2-3m / s2 ,;加速带8 = 3-10m / s2)。列入标准包括运动员必须参加的比赛;所选比赛中总比赛的70%。使用均值置信区间为95%的Oneway ANOVA分析确定组之间的差异(p <.05)。 Newman。; Keuls事后检验用于确定均值差异。结果:目前的研究结果表明,与总WR相比,DB的总覆盖距离,IMA总和,减速和加速总得分显着(p <0.05)高。在最大速度方面,DB和WR之间没有显着差异。 DL的最高速度,减速度和加速度Band 1的分数明显高于OL。 DL和OL在总覆盖距离,总IMA,减速度和加速带2之间没有显着差异。结论:DB和DL行驶的距离更远,平均最大值更高;速度更快,强度更高,爆炸性更强整个比赛中的动作要比WR和OL多。这项研究提供了位置体力需求的量化和大学橄榄球比赛的比较,可以用来开发针对特定位置的训练计划,以更好地为运动员做准备。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bayliff, Garrett Edward.;

  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oklahoma State University.;
  • 学科 Kinesiology.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 43 p.
  • 总页数 43
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号