首页> 外文学位 >Moral corruption and philosophic education in Plato's 'Phaedrus'.
【24h】

Moral corruption and philosophic education in Plato's 'Phaedrus'.

机译:柏拉图的“菲德斯”中的道德腐败和哲学教育。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation argues that Plato's Phaedrus is a case study in the philosophic cure of moral corruption, a process of intellectual decay that causes people to hold false opinions about matters of practical conduct and can lead to a systematic, pathological failure to recognize first principles for the ordering of the soul. Philosophic education by contrast leads toward true moral opinions and the practice of virtue, which is the proper, healthy condition of souls and the only state conducive to true happiness. The argument invokes two key ideas: first, philosophy is a kind of therapy whose teachers, like physicians, treat diseases, but in souls rather than bodies; and second, paying attention to dramatic aspects of the dialogue permits a fuller grasp of its doctrinal contents.;In the Phaedrus, Socrates helps a youthful Athenian aristocrat named Phaedrus overcome a false opinion about love by using philosophic analysis to correct popular views on the subject. Initially, Phaedrus shows undue enthusiasm for a speech written by the sophist Lysias that claims one should grant erotic favors to a non-lover rather than a lover. After Phaedrus reads the speech aloud, Socrates delivers two speeches of his own to clarify and refute the Lysian speech, and Phaedrus admits that Socrates has beaten Lysias at his own game. Using his familiar method of dialectic, Socrates explains the principles that made his speeches superior, the errors that make sophistic rhetoric a cause of moral corruption, and the theoretical basis of the cure he is attempting. The quality of Phaedrus's responses improves as he absorbs substantive philosophic doctrines: he rejects bodily pleasures as slavish, admits the weakness of a sophistic rhetoric based on literary devices and technical jargon, acknowledges the strength of a philosophic rhetoric based on knowledge of truth and an understanding of the human soul, concedes that dialectical education is better than emulating written speeches, and finally at the dialogue's end, endorses an epitome of Platonic ethics that suggests philosophic therapy has had a beneficial effect on him.
机译:本论文认为,柏拉图的《菲德斯》是对道德腐败的哲学治疗的案例研究,道德腐败是一种智力衰退的过程,导致人们对实际行为问题持错误看法,并可能导致系统性,病理性的失败,从而无法认识到道德操守的首要原则。灵魂的秩序。相比之下,哲学教育导致了真正的道德观念和美德的实践,这是灵魂的适当,健康的状况,并且是唯一有助于真正幸福的状态。该论点涉及两个关键思想:首先,哲学是一种治疗方法,其老师(例如医生)治疗疾病,但治疗的是灵魂而非身体。其次,关注对话的戏剧性方面,可以更全面地了解其教义内容。;在费城,苏格拉底通过哲学分析来纠正关于该话题的流行观点,从而帮助年轻的雅典贵族费城克服了关于爱情的错误看法。 。最初,Phaedrus对诡辩家Lysias的演讲表示过高的热情,该演讲声称,应该给非恋人而不是情人以情色。在Phaedrus大声朗读演讲后,Socrates发表了自己的两篇演讲以澄清和驳斥Lysian演讲,而Phaedrus承认Socrates在自己的游戏中击败了Lysias。苏格拉底采用他熟悉的辩证法,解释了使他的演讲出色的原则,使精巧修辞成为道德腐败根源的错误以及他所试图治愈的理论基础。 Phaedrus吸收了实质性的哲学学说,因此回应的质量得到了改善:他拒绝身体上的愉悦作为奴隶制,承认基于文学手段和技术术语的复杂主义修辞的弱点,承认基于对真理和理解的理解的哲学主义修辞的力量作为人类灵魂的灵魂,他承认辩证教育比模仿书面讲话要好,最后在对话结束时,他赞同柏拉图伦理的缩影,表明哲学治疗对他产生了有益的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Batchelder, Geoffrey M.;

  • 作者单位

    The Catholic University of America.;

  • 授予单位 The Catholic University of America.;
  • 学科 Literature Classical.;Language Rhetoric and Composition.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 241 p.
  • 总页数 241
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;哲学理论;语言学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号