首页> 外文学位 >The impact of focused, long-term, and collaborative professional development in math and science participants' self-efficacy, classroom practice, and student achievement.
【24h】

The impact of focused, long-term, and collaborative professional development in math and science participants' self-efficacy, classroom practice, and student achievement.

机译:专注,长期和协作式专业发展对数学和自然科学参与者的自我效能,课堂实践和学生成就的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a 2-year professional development model in math and science on the self-efficacy of the teacher and its effects on teacher practice and student outcomes. Further, this study sought to incorporate the instructional use of Inquiry-Based Learning methods of Problem-Based Learning, Japanese Lesson Study, and Action Research. Additionally, this study examined the impacts of these interventions on teacher efficacy and student outcomes. Thirty-eight collaborating participants were purposefully selected by the Math and Science Teacher Academy (MASTA) project grant co-directors because of their content-focused classrooms of mathematics and science. This quasi-experimental study included mathematics and science in-service teachers working on their masters in education. The 2-year, bi-monthly professional development model included collaborating Inquiry-Based Learning communities with in-depth focus on Japanese Lesson Study, Problem-Based Learning instruction, and Action Research.;A chi-square analysis was conducted by grade on the difference in passing rate from the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills mathematics and science tests between the MASTA participants and the state passing average. In mathematics there were significant v differences only at grades 3 and 7 where the state passing average was significantly higher than the MASTA students' passing rate. Only at grade 5 was the MASTA students' passing rate higher than the state, but the difference was not significantly different. The science passing rate received from three grade 5 MASTA participants was compared to the state average and a chi-squared was conducted. Although the passing rate for the grade 5 science test was 6% higher for MASTA student that the state, the difference was not statistically significant.;However, after analyzing the qualitative participant responses from data gathered during the 2-year MASTA grant the data clearly reflected that teachers participating in the MASTA grant felt the professional development helped to improve their own teacher-efficacy and knowledge in their content areas.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查数学和科学领域的2年专业发展模式对教师自我效能的影响及其对教师实践和学生成果的影响。此外,本研究试图将基于问题的学习,日语课研究和行动研究的基于探究的学习方法的教学用途纳入其中。此外,本研究检查了这些干预措施对教师效能和学生成果的影响。数学与科学教师学院(MASTA)项目拨款联合主任特意选择了38位合作参与者,因为他们的内容集中在数学和科学课堂上。这项准实验研究包括在教育硕士领域工作的数学和科学在职教师。该为期两年,每两个月的专业发展模型包括协作研究型学习社区,重点是日语课学习,问题型学习指导和行动研究;按年级对卡方进行卡方分析MASTA参与者与州及格平均水平之间的得克萨斯州知识和技能数学和科学测验评估合格率差异。在数学中,仅在3年级和7年级时才存在显着的v差异,这两个州的州及格平均水平明显高于MASTA学生的及格率。 MASTA学生的及格率仅在5年级时才高于州,但差异没有显着差异。从三个5年级MASTA参与者获得的科学通过率与州平均水平进行了比较,并进行了卡方检验。尽管该州的MASTA学生的5年级科学考试通过率比该州高6%,但差异没有统计学意义。反映出参加MASTA助学金的教师认为专业发展有助于提高他们在内容领域的教师效能和知识。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nottingham, Mary E.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas A&M University - Commerce.;

  • 授予单位 Texas A&M University - Commerce.;
  • 学科 Education Evaluation.;Education Mathematics.;Education Sciences.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 130 p.
  • 总页数 130
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号