首页> 外文学位 >India and China: A Comparative Analysis of Mobile Phones in Agriculture.
【24h】

India and China: A Comparative Analysis of Mobile Phones in Agriculture.

机译:印度和中国:农业手机的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 2010, China and India were named the first and second largest mobile phone markets in the world based on their number of subscribers. India and China have focused on extending their telecommunication services into rural areas for socio-economic benefits. Both countries liberalized and privatized the industry under different political regimes utilizing different strategies. The aim of this thesis is to examine the collaborative efforts of public and private agencies in India and the role they do in disseminating information to farmers through mobile phones when compared to the government agencies in China that have been created to share that information in order to determine which program is more effective. To answer this question, the thesis compares Indian and Chinese policies and programs enacted to encourage sales and use of mobile phones in the agricultural sector to increase efficiency and encourage growth. As free market principles and private for-profit corporations are generally more efficient than government agencies, this thesis hypothesizes that the policies and development initiatives taken by the Indian government are more successful in disseminating information than the government agency approach followed by China. In response to the above research question, the thesis reveals that while the mobile phone agricultural information service programs have been successful in their respective countries, the programs in India are more reliable and faster in disseminating information to farmers. This is determined because the number of subscribers in India's mobile phone agricultural information service programs grew 37.47% in 4 years, from 2008-2012, versus subscribers to China's agricultural information service programs that grew 21.1% from 2007-2010.
机译:根据用户数量,2010年中国和印度分别位列全球第一和第二大手机市场。印度和中国一直致力于将电信服务扩展到农村地区,以获得社会经济利益。两国都在采用不同策略的不同政治体制下实现了行业的自由化和私有化。本文的目的是检验印度公共和私人机构的合作努力,以及它们与通过建立手机共享信息的政府机构相比,它们在通过手机向农民传播信息方面的作用。确定哪个程序更有效。为了回答这个问题,本文比较了印度和中国为鼓励在农业部门销售和使用移动电话以提高效率和促进增长而制定的政策和计划。由于自由市场原则和私人营利性公司通常比政府机构更有效率,因此本文假设,印度政府采取的政策和发展举措在传播信息方面比中国遵循的政府机构方法更为成功。针对上述研究问题,本文揭示了尽管手机农业信息服务计划在各自国家取得了成功,但印度的计划在向农民传播信息方面更加可靠和快捷。确定这一点是因为,从2008年至2012年,印度手机农业信息服务计划的订户数量在4年中增长了37.47%,而从2007年至2010年,中国农业信息服务计划的订户数量增长了21.1%。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bonthu, Prashanthi.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 South Asian studies.;Business administration.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 83 p.
  • 总页数 83
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号