首页> 外文学位 >The motivators and the motivated: What mechanisms do nonprofit organizations use to spur engagement, and do they work? An exploratory case study.
【24h】

The motivators and the motivated: What mechanisms do nonprofit organizations use to spur engagement, and do they work? An exploratory case study.

机译:激励者和受激励者:非营利组织使用什么机制来促进参与,它们是否起作用?探索性案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The political engagement of citizens with their democratic government is fraught with difficulties of inertia, cynicism, lack of knowledge, access and efficacy. This research attempts to address questions of how people occupying a lower socio-economic status (SES) classification might improve their engagement. The research question is, "The motivators and the motivated: what mechanisms do non-profit organizations use to motivate individuals to become politically engaged, and, do they work?".;Through a qualitative exploratory case study of five human social-serving nonprofit agencies, and capitalizing on the scholarship of other political scientists, five criteria predictive of outcomes for engagement efforts by agency staff attempting to assist their clients to express their voice in their own governance is presented. The findings demonstrate that effective recruitment or encouragement of clients, coupled with the provision of education and skills, the use of "bridging" social capital, capitalization on client's rational particularistic self-interest and the presence of an effective agency leader or internal organizational entrepreneur may combine to produce engagement on the part of clients within lower SES classifications.;Additionally, the strengths of the exploratory case study method resulted in at least six potential future research questions. As with any research, there are study limitations, and this is no exception. However, some useful broad policy recommendations are also provided.
机译:公民与民主政府的政治接触充满了惯性,玩世不恭,缺乏知识,获取途径和效力的困难。这项研究试图解决人们如何以较低的社会经济地位(SES)分类来改善他们的参与度。研究的问题是:“动机和动机:非营利组织使用什么机制来激励个人参与政治活动,他们是否起作用?”。通过五个人类社会公益性非营利组织的定性探索性案例研究机构并利用其他政治学家的奖学金,提出了五个标准,这些标准可预测代理机构工作人员试图协助其客户在自己的治理中表达意见的努力所取得的成果。研究结果表明,有效地招募或鼓励客户,加上提供教育和技能,使用“桥接”社会资本,利用客户合理的特殊性自身利益进行资本化以及有效的机构负责人或内部组织企业家的存在结合以在较低的SES分类中使客户产生参与。此外,探索性案例研究方法的优势还导致至少六个潜在的未来研究问题。与任何研究一样,研究存在局限性,也不例外。但是,还提供了一些有用的广泛政策建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Farmer, Wesley S.;

  • 作者单位

    Temple University.;

  • 授予单位 Temple University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 196 p.
  • 总页数 196
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号