首页> 外文学位 >Life cycle assessments (LCAs) of pyrolysis-based gasoline and diesel from different regional feedstocks: Corn stover, switchgrass, sugar cane bagasse, waste wood, guinea grass, algae, and albizia
【24h】

Life cycle assessments (LCAs) of pyrolysis-based gasoline and diesel from different regional feedstocks: Corn stover, switchgrass, sugar cane bagasse, waste wood, guinea grass, algae, and albizia

机译:来自不同区域原料的热解汽油和柴油的生命周期评估(LCA):玉米秸秆,柳枝switch,甘蔗渣,废木材,几内亚草,藻类和白云杉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Renewable hydrocarbon biofuels are being investigated as possible alternatives to conventional liquid transportation fossil fuels like gasoline, kerosene (aviation fuel), and diesel. A diverse range of biomass feedstocks such as corn stover, sugarcane bagasse, switchgrass, waste wood, and algae, are being evaluated as candidates for pyrolysis and catalytic upgrading to produce drop-in hydrocarbon fuels. This research has developed preliminary life cycle assessments (LCA) for each feedstock-specific pathway and compared the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the hydrocarbon biofuels to current fossil fuels. As a comprehensive study, this analysis attempts to account for all of the GHG emissions associated with each feedstock pathway through the entire life cycle. Emissions from all stages including feedstock production, land use change, pyrolysis, stabilizing the pyrolysis oil for transport and storage, and upgrading the stabilized pyrolysis oil to a hydrocarbon fuel are included. In addition to GHG emissions, the energy requirements and water use have been evaluated over the entire life cycle. The goal of this research is to help understand the relative advantages and disadvantages of the feedstocks and the resultant hydrocarbon biofuels based on three environmental indicators; GHG emissions, energy demand, and water utilization. Results indicate that liquid hydrocarbon biofuels produced through this pyrolysis-based pathway can achieve greenhouse gas emission savings of greater than 50% compared to petroleum fuels, thus potentially qualifying these biofuels under the US EPA RFS2 program. GHG emissions from biofuels ranged from 10.7-74.3 g/MJ from biofuels derived from sugarcane bagasse and wild algae at the extremes of this range, respectively. The cumulative energy demand (CED) shows that energy in every biofuel process is primarily from renewable biomass and the remaining energy demand is mostly from fossil fuels. The CED for biofuel range from 1.25-3.25 MJ/MJ from biofuels derived from sugarcane bagasse to wild algae respectively, while the other feedstock-derived biofuels are around 2 MJ/MJ. Water utilization is primarily from cooling water use during the pyrolysis stage if irrigation is not used during the feedstock production stage. Water use ranges from 1.7 - 17.2 gallons of water per kg of biofuel from sugarcane bagasse to open pond algae, respectively.
机译:人们正在研究可再生的碳氢化合物生物燃料,以替代传统的液体运输矿物燃料,例如汽油,煤油(航空燃料)和柴油。人们正在评估各种生物质原料,例如玉米秸秆,甘蔗渣,柳枝switch,废木和藻类,作为热解和催化提质生产直接入式烃类燃料的候选者。这项研究针对每种特定原料途径开发了初步的生命周期评估(LCA),并将碳氢化合物生物燃料的温室气体(GHG)排放与当前的化石燃料进行了比较。作为一项全面的研究,该分析试图说明整个生命周期中与每种原料途径相关的所有GHG排放。包括原料生产,土地用途变化,热解,稳定热解油以进行运输和存储以及将稳定的热解油升级为烃类燃料等所有阶段的排放。除温室气体排放外,还对整个生命周期内的能源需求和用水进行了评估。这项研究的目的是基于三个环境指标帮助理解原料和所得烃类生物燃料的相对优缺点;温室气体排放,能源需求和水利用。结果表明,与石油燃料相比,通过这种基于热解的途径生产的液态碳氢化合物生物燃料可实现超过50%的温室气体减排,从而有可能在美国EPA RFS2计划下使这些生物燃料合格。在该范围的极端情况下,来自甘蔗渣和野藻的生物燃料产生的生物燃料温室气体排放量分别为10.7-74.3 g / MJ。累积能源需求(CED)表明,每个生物燃料过程中的能源主要来自可再生生物质,其余能源需求主要来自化石燃料。从甘蔗渣中提取的生物燃料到野生藻类,生物燃料的CED范围为1.25-3.25 MJ / MJ,而其他原料衍生的生物燃料的CED约为2 MJ / MJ。如果在原料生产阶段不使用灌溉,则水的利用主要来自热解阶段的冷却水使用。从甘蔗渣到开阔的池塘藻类,每公斤生物燃料的用水量分别为1.7-17.2加仑。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mihalek, Matthew J.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan Technological University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan Technological University.;
  • 学科 Chemical engineering.;Alternative Energy.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 168 p.
  • 总页数 168
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号