首页> 外文学位 >Engineering, teaching, and technology: A nationwide assessment of instructional internet use by engineering faculty.
【24h】

Engineering, teaching, and technology: A nationwide assessment of instructional internet use by engineering faculty.

机译:工程,教学与技术:工程学院在全国范围内对教学互联网使用的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There has been an explosion of internet use among college students over the last decade for at least two important reasons: the proliferation of available resources and the arrival of a digital native generation to university campuses. Not surprisingly, engineering students are entering undergraduate programs possessing a much different skill set than previous generations, which has led to a decline in the popularity of traditional engineering pedagogy. Numerous conceptual models have been developed in the field of instructional technology, as researchers have attempted to classify and effectively integrate new technology practices into 21st century educational contexts. One of the most prominent models is Technology, Pedagogy and Content Knowledge (TPACK), which separates instructors' knowledge into the three listed categories and describes their instructional strategies based on the presence and level of integration of the three knowledge categories. A newer, engineering-specific model separates engineering faculty into three archetypes based on their instructional internet use: internet adopters, internet users, and internet resisters.;This study quantitatively assesses the instructional internet use by a sample of 1126 tenured and tenure-track engineering faculty in the United States. Factor analysis revealed three significant factors: use of internet resources for content delivery, guiding students' internet research, and faculty beliefs on the usefulness of internet resources. The distribution of these factors was used to attempt to identify each of the three archetypes, and to discretely measure the presence and level of integration of the technology component of the TPACK model. While exceptional cases could be identified as internet adopters or resisters, the results do not support the existence of three unique archetypes. Similarly, the presence and degree of technology integration does not fit any categorical model, but rather a broad spectrum of internet technology usage and beliefs. Finally, regression analyses show that demographic and institutional variables are only minimally predictive of faculty beliefs and practices regarding instructional internet use.;This study contributes to the understanding of instructional internet use in undergraduate engineering education, and provides insight into the applicability of two instructional technology models. Findings from the study may also inform institutional policy and practice regarding professional development initiatives.
机译:过去十年来,大学生使用互联网的数量激增,至少有两个重要原因:可用资源的激增和数字化本地一代进入大学校园。毫不奇怪,工程专业的学生进入大学课程时所拥有的技能与前几代人大不相同,这导致传统工程学教学法的普及率下降。随着研究人员试图将新技术实践分类并有效地整合到21世纪的教育环境中,在教学技术领域已经开发了许多概念模型。最突出的模型之一是技术,教学法和内容知识(TPACK),它将教师的知识分为三个列出的类别,并根据这三个知识类别的存在和集成程度来描述他们的教学策略。一种更新的,针对特定工程的模型根据工程教师的互联网使用情况将工程教师分为三种原型:互联网采用者,互联网用户和互联网抵制者;本研究通过对1126个终身任职和终身制工程的样本进行定量评估,以评估教学互联网的使用情况美国的教师。因素分析揭示了三个重要因素:利用互联网资源进行内容传递,指导学生进行互联网研究以及教师对互联网资源的实用性的信念。这些因素的分布用于尝试识别三种原型,并离散地测量TPACK模型技术组件的存在和集成程度。虽然可以将特殊情况确定为互联网采用者或抵制者,但结果并不支持三种独特原型的存在。同样,技术集成的存在和程度也不适合任何分类模型,而是适用于广泛的互联网技术使用和信念。最后,回归分析表明,人口统计学和制度变量仅能最小程度地预测教师对教学互联网使用的信念和实践。;本研究有助于理解本科工程教育中教学互联网的使用,并为两种教学技术的适用性提供了见识。楷模。该研究的发现还可以为有关专业发展计划的机构政策和实践提供参考。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lehman, Alexander.;

  • 作者单位

    University of San Diego.;

  • 授予单位 University of San Diego.;
  • 学科 Educational technology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 126 p.
  • 总页数 126
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号