首页> 外文学位 >Three Proposals to Simplify the Federal Student Aid System: A Critical Reply From Financial Aid Administrators at Historically Black Colleges and Universities.
【24h】

Three Proposals to Simplify the Federal Student Aid System: A Critical Reply From Financial Aid Administrators at Historically Black Colleges and Universities.

机译:简化联邦学生资助体系的三项建议:历史上黑人大学和大学的财务资助管理员的重要答复。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Financial aid programs are supposed to improve access and affordability in higher education (Gillen, 2009). The effectiveness of these programs is increasingly being questioned as college attainment figures stagnate and the financial burden on students and families continues to climb year after year. The purpose of this study was to examine the views of financial aid administrators at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) on simplifying the federal student aid process. The quantitative research study attempted to answer questions using descriptive statistics. The data were compiled by surveying HBCU financial aid administrators. The simplification proposals reviewed were designed by the Obama Administration (U.S. Department of Education), National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators (NASFAA), and Rethinking Student Aid Study Group.;The study focused on HBCU financial aid administratorfs preferences regarding three simplification proposals. In an effort to add to the field's understanding of the challenges faced by low-income students, a survey regarding the simplification of the federal student aid system was distributed to HBCU financial aid administrators. Historically Black Colleges and Universities were chosen because they assist and service a disproportionate number of low-income students. Survey respondents agreed in their perceptions regarding the simplification proposals that promote an easier application process with consolidated and streamlined individual programs. The survey respondents strongly agreed with performing a U.S. Department of Education and Internal Revenue Service database match. Survey respondents agreed with eliminating the links between Title IV participation, voter registration material distribution, and Constitution Day observances. Surprisingly, the survey respondents had mixed perceptions about whether the application process as it currently exists act as a barrier to access, especially among low-income applicants. The key attributes---simplicity and certainty---are sorely missing in the federal student aid system (Dynarski & Scott-Clayton, 2007).
机译:财政援助计划被认为可以改善高等教育的可及性和负担能力(Gillen,2009)。随着大学文凭人数停滞不前,学生和家庭的经济负担逐年上升,这些计划的有效性越来越受到质疑。这项研究的目的是研究历史悠久的黑人大学和大学(HBCU)的财务援助管理者对简化联邦学生援助程序的看法。定量研究试图使用描述性统计来回答问题。数据是通过对HBCU经济援助管理员进行调查而汇编的。审查的简化提案是由奥巴马政府(美国教育部),美国学生资助援助者协会(NASFAA)和重新思考学生资助研究小组设计的;该研究的重点是HBCU资助者对三个简化提案的偏好。为了加深对低收入学生面临的挑战的了解,向HBCU经济援助管理员分发了有关简化联邦学生援助系统的调查。从历史上看,黑人高等学校之所以被选中,是因为它们为数量众多的低收入学生提供帮助和服务。被调查者对简化提案的看法表示同意,这些提案通过合并和精简的单个程序促进了更容易的申请流程。受访者强烈同意执行美国教育部和美国国税局的数据库匹配。调查的受访者同意消除标题IV的参与,选民登记材料的分发与宪法日的遵守之间的联系。令人惊讶的是,受访者对目前存在的申请流程是否会构成获取障碍,尤其是在低收入申请人中,存在多种看法。联邦学生资助系统非常缺少关键特性-简单性和确定性(Dynarski&Scott-Clayton,2007)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boyd, Marcia D.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Education Finance.;Education Higher Education Administration.;African American Studies.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 238 p.
  • 总页数 238
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号