首页> 外文学位 >Lending to small-scale farmers in South Africa: A case for best practices in formal institutions.
【24h】

Lending to small-scale farmers in South Africa: A case for best practices in formal institutions.

机译:向南非的小农贷款:正规机构的最佳做法案例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The lack of access to agricultural credit is a constraint to the development of the small-scale segment of the agricultural sector. The challenge for formal financial institutions is to provide agricultural credit that meets the unique demands of the entire agricultural sector (both commercial and emerging sectors). Although small-scale farmers face a number of challenges, lack of capital for investment contributes significantly to the lowering of smallscale farmers' productivity levels. The challenge of access to agricultural credit from formal financial institutions is longstanding. Although some improvements have been made, a large proportion of small-scale farmers are yet to be reached by these institutions. One of the ways in which formal institutions can promote access to credit for small-scale farmers is to adopt best practices in lending. The study sought to establish whether formal finance institutions in South Africa adhere to best practices in their agricultural lending operations for small-scale farmers.;The study adopted a qualitative approach that utilised primary and secondary information obtained from reports, manuals and other relevant documents in the public domain as well indepth interviews with key role-players from the major formal finance institutions.;The results of the study revealed that formal financial institutions in South Africa have not found appropriate delivery modalities that encourage and support agricultural finance accessibility among small-scale farmers. There have been considerable developments in terms of product type and product design in order to meet the demands of small and medium enterprises as well as agricultural clients. However, there still seems to remain gaps in terms of the different categories of emerging farmers that can be adequately financed by formal finance institutions. The loan appraisal process in formal finance institutions is based on the bankability of the farm enterprise and there is a heavy reliance on 'traditional' collateral requirement. There are few examples of collateral alternatives and substitutes that are used in practice and are usually of lesser value but also burdensome on the part of formal financial institutions (thus, a need for equity contributions remains necessary). Given the nature of the formal finance institutions considered in the study viz. commercial banks and the Land Bank; with their highly competitive and sophisticated corporate environment, and operations underpinned by a strictly business approach -- there is little room left for a developmental agenda in terms of their lending practices.;Though private sector institutions play a significant role in theSouth African economy, the role of the state remains quite large with regard to the ambitionof a developmental state. It is within this dynamism that the public-private dichotomy of agricultural finance arises. There is also a gap in terms of providing the much needed non-financial support, such as access to markets, technical skills, or collateral alternatives. The environment within which formal finance institutions provide agricultural credit has changed, and agricultural lenders need to identify the arising opportunities in small-scale farmer development. The current status quo in small-scale agricultural lending best practices in South Africa leaves much room for development.;A review of literature indicates that there are countries whose formal financial institutions have achieved some success in improving access to finance for small-scale farmers. Hence, it is important to find out what these institutions have done, particularly the best practices they have adopted in this regard. Best practices in agricultural finance are the innovative methods/techniques/and procedures that address the supply- and demand-side constraints and challenges (from both the finance and agricultural sectors' perspectives) and thus improve the levels of access to agricultural finance. The response of formal finance institutions to the risks and uncertainties inherent in the sector is to enforce stringent collateral requirements that are restrictive for small-scale farmers.
机译:缺乏获得农业信贷的机会限制了农业部门小规模部门的发展。正规金融机构面临的挑战是提供满足整个农业部门(商业和新兴部门)独特需求的农业信贷。尽管小农户面临许多挑战,但缺乏投资资本极大地降低了小农户的生产率水平。正规金融机构获得农业信贷的挑战是长期的。尽管已经取得了一些进步,但这些机构尚未达到很大比例的小规模农民。正规机构可以促进小农户获得信贷的方式之一就是采用贷款的最佳做法。该研究试图确定南非的正规金融机构在向小规模农民提供农业贷款的过程中是否遵循最佳做法。;该研究采用了定性方法,利用了从报告,手册和其他相关文件中获得的主要和次要信息。公共领域,以及与主要正规金融机构的关键角色参与者的深入访谈。;研究结果表明,南非的正规金融机构尚未找到合适的交付方式来鼓励和支持小规模农业金融的可及性农民。为了满足中小企业和农业客户的需求,在产品类型和产品设计方面有了长足的发展。但是,就新兴农户的不同类别而言,似乎仍存在差距,这些差距可以由正规金融机构提供足够的资金。正规金融机构的贷款评估过程基于农场企业的可融资性,并且严重依赖于“传统”抵押要求。在实践中很少使用抵押替代品和替代品的实例,这些替代品和替代品通常价值较低,但对正规金融机构而言又是沉重的负担(因此,仍然需要股权投资)。鉴于研究中考虑的正规金融机构的性质,即。商业银行和土地银行;凭借其高度竞争和成熟的公司环境以及严格的商业方法为基础的运营-就其借贷方式而言,发展议程几乎没有余地;尽管私营部门机构在南非经济中发挥着重要作用,在发展国家的雄心方面,国家的作用仍然很大。正是在这种动力下,出现了农业金融的公私二分法。在提供急需的非金融支持(例如进入市场,技术技能或替代抵押品)方面也存在差距。正规金融机构提供农业信贷的环境已经改变,农业贷方需要确定小农发展中出现的机会。南非小规模农业贷款最佳做法的现状为发展留出了很大的空间。文献综述表明,有些国家的正规金融机构在改善小农获得融资方面取得了一些成功。因此,重要的是要找出这些机构所做的事情,尤其是它们在这方面采取的最佳做法。农业金融的最佳做法是创新的方法/技术/程序,这些方法/技术(从金融和农业部门的角度来看)解决了供需双方的制约和挑战,从而提高了获得农业金融的水平。正规金融机构对该部门固有的风险和不确定性的反应是执行严格的抵押要求,这些要求对小农户是限制性的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Qwabe, Nontobeko.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pretoria (South Africa).;

  • 授予单位 University of Pretoria (South Africa).;
  • 学科 Agriculture.;African studies.
  • 学位 M.I.Agr.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 116 p.
  • 总页数 116
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号