首页> 外文学位 >China's New Social Governance.
【24h】

China's New Social Governance.

机译:中国的新社会治理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores the sources and mechanisms of social policy change in China during the reform era. In it, I first argue that, starting in the late 1990s, China's leadership began shifting social policy away from the neoliberal approach that characterized the first two decades of the reform era towards a New Governance approach. Second, I ask the question why this policy transformation is taking place. I employ a political economy argument to answer this question, which locates the source of China's New Governance transition in diversifying societal demand for public goods provision. China's leadership is concerned about the destabilizing impacts of this social transformation, and has embraced the decentralized tools of New Governance in order to improve responsiveness and short up its own legitimacy. Third, I address how China's leadership is undertaking this policy shift. I argue that China's version of New Governance is being undertaken in such as way as to protect the Chinese Communist Party's monopoly over power. This double-edged strategy is aimed at improving the capacity consists of Social Construction, on the one hand, and Social Management Innovation, on the other. Social Construction aims to increase and diversity the supply of public goods provision by building the capacity of local governments and non-state organizations to address their own social problems. Social Management Innovation consists of parallel policies and institutions the party-state is creating to ensure its monopoly over social power in the face of Social Construction. The dissertation includes case studies of Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong.
机译:本文探讨了改革时期中国社会政策变革的根源和机制。在这篇文章中,我首先指出,从1990年代末开始,中国的领导层开始将社会政策从以改革时代的前二十年为特征的新自由主义方法转向新治理方法。第二,我问一个问题,为什么要进行这种政策转变。我用一种政治经济学的观点来回答这个问题,该问题为使新的公共管理提供多样化的社会需求找到了中国新治理过渡的根源。中国领导人担心这种社会转型所产生的破坏性影响,并接受了新治理的权力下放工具,以提高响应能力并缩短其合法性。第三,我谈到中国领导人如何进行这一政策转变。我认为,中国版《新治理》的实施是为了保护中国共产党对权力的垄断。这种双刃剑战略旨在提高能力,一方面包括社会建设,另一方面包括社会管理创新。社会建设旨在通过建设地方政府和非国家组织解决其自身社会问题的能力,来增加公共产品供应的多样性。社会管理创新包括党国为确保面对社会建设对社会权力的垄断而制定的平行政策和制度。本文包括北京,上海和广东的案例研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Loeb, Ketty A.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Political science.;Public policy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 304 p.
  • 总页数 304
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号