首页> 外文学位 >Late modernist schizophrenia: From phenomenology to cultural pathology.
【24h】

Late modernist schizophrenia: From phenomenology to cultural pathology.

机译:晚期现代精神分裂症:从现象学到文化病理学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation demonstrates how representations of schizophrenic characters in novels can combat widespread misuses of psychiatric terms and help readers empathize with mentally ill people if we read these novels with some understanding of psychiatry and the psychoanalysis that influenced them. I undertake a critical genealogy of the schizophrenia concept's migration from the mental health professions to fiction, concentrating on the period from the German invasion of Paris in June 1940 to the events of May 1968, with some attention to contemporary uses of the schizophrenia concept by cultural theorists. Experimental novelists writing during the apogee and aftermath of National Socialism from the 1940s to the 1970s represent schizophrenia as they understood it to express the painful emotions produced by World War II's challenge to the value of experimental writing. In the postwar fiction of Samuel Beckett (1906--1989) and Georges Perec (1936--1982), imitating schizophrenia results in careful disclosures of disintegrating life-worlds: in Beckett's case, the dissolution of the James Joyce circle and the communities of modernist exiles it exemplified, which the German invasion of Paris destroyed; in Perec's case, the deaths of his parents in the defense of France and the Holocaust, and the annihilated six million Jews including his mother. Reading Beckett and Perec's novels develops readers' abilities to empathize with both schizophrenic people and the loved ones of Holocaust victims. While those who avoided the concentration camps like Perec did not experience their horrors firsthand, losing relatives and other loved ones transformed their lives, just as losing two thirds of its Jewish population devastated European culture despite reticence to acknowledge the Holocaust's monstrous effects in the postwar years. Late modernist fiction can thus both help readers understand the Holocaust's cultural impact and foster the skills necessary to understand experiences of severe mental disorder. Such empathic understanding is more humane than romanticizing or stigmatizing schizophrenia or other mental illnesses, and it helps us register the Holocaust's degradation of humanity anew rather than walling off this event in the past or regarding it solely as a Jewish issue. Late modernist fiction provides a more precise, caring alternative to the romanticizing/stigmatizing binary perpetuated by postwar cultural theorists because, from the 1930s to the 1970s, the fiction gradually transitions from reinforcing that binary to enabling empathy for traumatized and mentally ill people. Such fiction anticipated recent phenomenologies of schizophrenia---real experiences of distress and impairment rather than socially constructed concepts of madness---and traumatic shame, an emotional experience of oneself or one's community as inadequate in response to failure, especially the Holocaust as a failure of European culture and modernity. Both traumatic shame and severe mental disorder can make the body conspicuous, alienate people from their cultures, and disintegrate structures of salience and belonging that make sustained relationships and projects possible. Recent existential-phenomenological theories of mental disorder enable reintegrating schizophrenia representation in fiction into the history of literary modernism, especially its concern with historical forces disrupting the minds of individuals. These theories explain changes in mentally ill people's sense of possibilities for developing themselves and relating to others, from the way they experience their bodies to the way they use language. Hence I use these theories to demonstrate how knowledge of schizophrenia enabled post-Holocaust novelists to travesty and transform earlier novelists' uses of fictional minds to interrogate cultural change.
机译:我的论文证明了小说中的精神分裂症人物表征可以如何克服广泛滥用的精神病学术语,并帮助读者理解精神病患者,如果我们对这些小说有一定的精神病学理解和影响他们的心理分析。我对精神分裂症概念从精神卫生专业到小说的迁移进行了批判性的谱系研究,重点是从1940年6月德国入侵巴黎到1968年5月的事件,并关注文化对精神分裂症概念的当代使用理论家。实验小说家在1940年代至1970年代国家社会主义的顶峰与后期期间写作,代表了精神分裂症,因为他们理解精神分裂症是表达第二次世界大战挑战实验写作的价值所产生的痛苦情绪。在塞缪尔·贝克特(1906--1989)和乔治·佩雷克(1936--1982)的战后小说中,模仿精神分裂症导致人们仔细地揭示了生活世界的瓦解:以贝克特为例,詹姆斯·乔伊斯圈子的解体和现代主义流放了它的例子,德国入侵巴黎摧毁了它。在佩雷克(Perec)案中,他的父母为捍卫法国和大屠杀而丧生,包括他母亲在内的600万犹太人被歼灭。读贝克特和佩雷克的小说可以提高读者同情精神分裂症患者和大屠杀受害者亲人的能力。虽然那些避免像佩雷克这样的集中营的人没有亲身经历过恐怖,但是失去亲人和其他亲人改变了他们的生活,就像失去三分之二的犹太人口毁灭了欧洲文化一样,尽管人们不愿承认战后大屠杀的巨大影响。 。因此,近代现代主义小说既可以帮助读者了解大屠杀的文化影响,又可以培养理解严重精神障碍经验所必需的技能。这种同理心的理解比对精神分裂症或其他精神疾病进行浪漫化或污蔑化更人道,它有助于我们重新记录大屠杀对人类的降级,而不是遏制过去的事件或仅将其视为犹太问题。晚期的现代主义小说为战后文化理论家永久化浪漫主义/污名化的二元词提供了一种更精确,更贴心的替代方法,因为从1930年代到1970年代,小说逐渐从加强二元词转变为对精神病患者和精神病患者产生共鸣。这种小说预料到了最近的精神分裂症现象学-真正的痛苦和损伤体验,而不是社会建构的疯狂概念-以及创伤性的羞耻感,即对自身或社区的情感体验不足以应对失败,特别是大屠杀欧洲文化和现代性的失败。耻辱感和严重的精神错乱都可能使身体显眼,使人们与他们的文化疏远,并使能与人建立持久关系和项目的显着性和归属感结构瓦解。最近的精神障碍的存在现象学理论使小说中的精神分裂症表现形式重新融入文学现代主义的历史,特别是其对历史力量的破坏扰乱了个人的思想。这些理论解释了精神疾病患者从发展自己的方式和与他人建立联系的可能性的观念的变化,从他们体验身体的方式到他们使用语言的方式。因此,我用这些理论来说明精神分裂症的知识如何使大屠杀后小说家能够发疯并改变早期小说家对虚构思维的使用,以审视文化变革。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gagas, Jonathan.;

  • 作者单位

    Temple University.;

  • 授予单位 Temple University.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.;Literature Comparative.;Literature English.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 341 p.
  • 总页数 341
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号