首页> 外文学位 >Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of the Type III IFN Response.
【24h】

Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of the Type III IFN Response.

机译:III型IFN反应的转录和表观遗传调控。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Cytokines are signaling molecules that play an indispensable role in maintaining homeostasis and relaying intercellular communication in the immune system. Interferons (iFNs) are a subset of cytokines that effectively restrict the replication and dissemination of many microbial pathogens. As the most recently identified member of the classical IFN family, type III IFN (IFN-lambda) exhibits similar antiviral and anti-proliferative activities to type I IFN (IFN-alpha/beta) but also possesses many interesting and unique features.;Resembling IFN-alpha and IFN-beta, upon binding to its cognate receptor complex, IFN-lambda signals through the classical JAK-STAT pathway and induces IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) expression. Despite appearing to be mediated via identical signaling cascades, type I and type III IFNs have divergent biological activities. However, it remains unclear whether or not these functionally related cytokines activate common or distinct patterns of ISGs. It is tempting to speculate that IFN-lambda triggers the expression of a specialized group of ISGs, which would partially account for its non-redundant role in the immune system. It is also possible that IFN-lambda exhibits a distinctive temporal kinetics in activating signal transduction and the downstream events. This varying dynamics in cytokine signaling may prove essential against certain infections in an in vivo context.;Another major disparity between type I and type III IFNs is the utilization of different receptors and how these complexes are spatially regulated. In contrast to the ubiquitous expression of IFN-alpha/beta receptor on virtually all cell types, IFN-lambda receptor, especially the alpha subunit that confers ligand-binding specificity, is confined to the lung, intestine and liver, but not found in immune cells or other parts of the body such as the blood and brain. Despite the consensus that IFN-lambda plays a pivotal role in the antiviral response at mucosal surfaces, the molecular mechanisms that contribute to restricted IFN-lambda receptor expression remain unknown. On the basis of understanding the underlying regulatory network, both antiviral and antitumor functions of IFN-lambda could be harnessed via up-regulation of receptor levels in formerly insensitive cell types.;In this dissertation, I will discuss both the temporal and spatial regulation of the type III IFN response from transcriptional and epigenetic perspectives. This study will expand the current knowledge of IFN-lambda and explore the potential clinical uses of the cytokine by examining its distinctive signaling patterns and the mechanisms regulating its receptor distribution.
机译:细胞因子是信号分子,在维持体内平衡和传递免疫系统中的细胞间通讯中起着不可或缺的作用。干扰素(iFN)是有效限制许多微生物病原体复制和传播的细胞因子的子集。作为经典IFN家族的最新成员,III型IFN(IFN-λ)与I型IFN(IFN-α/ beta)表现出相似的抗病毒和抗增殖活性,但也具有许多有趣而独特的特征。 IFN-α和IFN-β与其同源受体复合物结合后,通过经典的JAK-STAT途径发出IFN-λ信号,并诱导IFN刺激的基因(ISG)表达。尽管看起来是通过相同的信号级联介导的,但I型和III型IFN具有不同的生物学活性。但是,尚不清楚这些功能相关的细胞因子是否激活ISG的常见或独特模式。试图推测IFN-λ会触发ISG专门小组的表达,这可能部分解释了ISG在免疫系统中的非冗余作用。 IFN-λ在激活信号转导和下游事件中表现出独特的时间动力学也是可能的。细胞因子信号传导的这种变化动态可能证明在体内环境下对某些感染至关重要。I型和III型IFN之间的另一个主要区别是对不同受体的利用以及这些复合物在空间上的调控方式。与几乎所有细胞类型上普遍存在的IFN-α/β受体相反,IFN-lambda受体(尤其是赋予配体结合特异性的α亚基)仅限于肺,肠和肝,但在免疫中未发现细胞或身体其他部位,例如血液和大脑。尽管人们普遍认为IFN-λ在黏膜表面的抗病毒反应中起着关键作用,但导致IFN-λ受体表达受限的分子机制仍然未知。在了解潜在的调控网络的基础上,可以通过上调以前不敏感的细胞类型的受体水平来利用IFN-λ的抗病毒和抗肿瘤功能。从转录和表观遗传学角度来看,III型IFN应答。这项研究将扩大目前对IFN-λ的了解,并通过检查其独特的信号传导模式和调节其受体分布的机制来探索细胞因子的潜在临床应用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ding, Siyuan.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Biology Microbiology.;Biology Virology.;Biology Molecular.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 204 p.
  • 总页数 204
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号