首页> 外文学位 >A Study of Open Source Web Servers in Virtual Computing Technology
【24h】

A Study of Open Source Web Servers in Virtual Computing Technology

机译:虚拟计算技术中的开放源Web服务器研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study focused on comparing performance with Apache running on Ubuntu compared with a bare-metal server based on the theoretical framework queuing theory model. The theoretical framework, used in this study imitate server resources such as CPU utilization, memory utilization, and response time, as they predict the estimates of utilization of servers. Open source tools and the Linux operating system along with Windows 10 were the platforms for the test. The problem with the poor performance of a virtualized server compares quantitatively with a bare-metal server. The central processing unit (CPU) utilization, memory utilization, and average response time values were measured and compared between a virtual and bare-metal server. This researcher implemented the methodology by using JMeter to run a load against each environment and quantitatively compared. The Mann-Whitney U test indicated that CPU utilization was greater for the virtualized server (Mdn = 14.71) than for the bare-metal server (Mdn = 6.750), U = .000, z = -7.897, p < .000, r = -1.2186. This finding means that the bare-metal server's CPU used fewer resources and worked less to do the same amount calculations. The Mann-Whitney U test indicated that memory utilization was greater for the bare-metal server (Mdn = 33.292) than for the virtual server (Mdn = 32.403), U = .006, z = 2.729, p < .000, r = .421. The nonparametric test for memory utilization showed that the smaller utilization demonstrated that there was more free memory remaining during the test runs for the virtual server that showed that the bare-metal server performed worse than the virtual server. Concerning average response time, the Mann-Whitney U test indicated that there was no significant difference for virtualization (Mdn =. 583) compared with the bare-metal server (Mdn = .584), U = 1.252, z = 1,014, p = .211, r = .193. The overall conclusion indicated that bare-metal servers performed better (CPU utilization) than virtualized servers but worse for memory utilization when using Apache hosted on Ubuntu on Linux but no difference concerning average response time. A recommendation for future research may involve using another Linux distribution, i.e., Fedora, Debian, and openSUSE.
机译:这项研究的重点是将性能与基于理论框架排队理论模型的裸机服务器与在Ubuntu上运行的Apache进行比较。本研究中使用的理论框架模仿服务器资源,例如CPU利用率,内存利用率和响应时间,因为它们可以预测服务器利用率的估算值。开源工具和Linux操作系统以及Windows 10是测试的平台。与裸机服务器相比,虚拟服务器性能低下的问题在数量上可以与之相比。测量并比较了虚拟服务器和裸机服务器之间的中央处理器(CPU)利用率,内存利用率和平均响应时间值。这位研究人员通过使用JMeter对每种环境运行负载并进行了定量比较,从而实现了该方法。 Mann-Whitney U检验表明,虚拟服务器(Mdn = 14.71)的CPU利用率高于裸机服务器(Mdn = 6.750)的CPU利用率,U = .000,z = -7.897,p <.000,r = -1.2186。这一发现意味着裸机服务器的CPU使用更少的资源,并且在进行相同数量的计算时工作量也减少了。 Mann-Whitney U测试表明,裸机服务器(Mdn = 33.292)的内存利用率大于虚拟服务器(Mdn = 32.403)的内存利用率,U = .006,z = 2.729,p <.000,r = .421。内存利用率的非参数测试表明,利用率较低表明虚拟服务器在测试运行期间剩余的可用内存更多,这表明裸机服务器的性能比虚拟服务器差。关于平均响应时间,Mann-Whitney U检验表明,与裸机(Mdn = .584)相比,虚拟化(Mdn = .583)没有显着差异,U = 1.252,z = 1,014,p = .211,r = .193。总体结论表明,在Linux上使用Ubuntu上托管的Apache时,裸机服务器的性能(CPU利用率)比虚拟服务器好,但内存利用率较差,但平均响应时间没有差异。关于未来研究的建议可能涉及使用另一个Linux发行版,即Fedora,Debian和openSUSE。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lozupone, Vincent.;

  • 作者单位

    Northcentral University.;

  • 授予单位 Northcentral University.;
  • 学科 Business administration.;Computer science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 133 p.
  • 总页数 133
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号