首页> 外文学位 >A kinematic comparison of split-belt and single-belt treadmill walking and the effects of accommodation.
【24h】

A kinematic comparison of split-belt and single-belt treadmill walking and the effects of accommodation.

机译:皮带式和单皮带式跑步机的运动学比较以及调节的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction. Instrumented treadmills are becoming increasingly more common in gait laboratories. Instrumented side-split treadmills allow the collection of forces under each foot during walking. However, there may be a tendency to increase the base of support when walking on these treadmills, influencing other frontal plane mechanics as well. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of walking on a side-split instrumented treadmill on base of gait and frontal plane kinematics of the lower extremity. Methods. Twenty subjects walked on both a split and a single-belt treadmill for 10 minutes each. Base of gait and frontal plane kinematic angles and variability data were recorded. A two-factor repeated measures ANOVA (belt condition x time) was used to identify any differences between the two conditions, as well as over the 10 minute accommodation period. The relationships between the change in base of gait and change in each kinematic variable were also determined. Results. No significant interactions were found, thus only main effects were assessed. On average, the base of gait was 3.9 cm wider on the split-belt treadmill. A significant, but small (0.4°) reduction was seen in knee adduction, and no difference was seen in hip or rearfoot frontal plane kinematics on the split-belt condition. In terms of correlations, the increase in base of gait was significantly related to a decrease in peak knee and hip adduction angles. Base of gait variability was significantly reduced on the split-belt condition. In contrast, hip adduction variability was significantly increased. Conclusion. The 4 mm gap between the treadmill belts significantly increased the base of gait in all subjects. However, this had a negligible effect on the other lower extremity kinematics.
机译:介绍。仪器式跑步机在步态实验室中变得越来越普遍。配有仪表的侧开式跑步机可在步行过程中在每只脚下收集力量。但是,在这些跑步机上行走时,可能会增加支撑的基础,同时也会影响其他前额面力学。因此,本研究的目的是研究在步态和下肢额叶运动学的基础上,在侧裂式仪器跑步机上行走的效果。方法。 20名受试者分别在分裂式和单带式跑步机上行走了10分钟。记录步态的基础和额面运动学角度以及变异性数据。使用两因素重复测量方差分析(皮带条件x时间)来识别两种条件之间以及在10分钟的适应期内的任何差异。还确定了步态基础的变化与每个运动学变量的变化之间的关系。结果。没有发现明显的相互作用,因此仅评估了主要作用。平均而言,皮带式跑步机的步态基础宽3.9 cm。膝关节内收明显减少,但减少幅度很小(0.4°),在分开皮带的情况下,髋部或后足的额叶运动学无差异。就相关性而言,步态基础的增加与峰值膝盖和髋关节内收角的减少显着相关。分开皮带的情况下步态变异性的基础明显降低。相反,髋关节内收变异性显着增加。结论。跑步机皮带之间的4毫米间隙显着增加了所有受试者的步态基础。但是,这对其他下肢运动学的影响可忽略不计。

著录项

  • 作者

    Altman, Allison R.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Delaware.;

  • 授予单位 University of Delaware.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Rehabilitation and Therapy.Biophysics Biomechanics.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 35 p.
  • 总页数 35
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号