首页> 外文学位 >Morality, sociability, and competence: Distinct and interactive dimensions of social cognition.
【24h】

Morality, sociability, and competence: Distinct and interactive dimensions of social cognition.

机译:道德,社交能力和能力:社会认知的不同维度和互动维度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research explores the structure of social cognitive judgments and the role of moral evaluations in everyday social cognition. In Chapter 1, I show that morality and sociability are distinct dimensions in lay theories of personality and stereotype content, contrary to dominant two-dimensional models of social cognition that consider these to be two closely related aspects of a superordinate prosocial dimension of judgment. In three studies, judgments of real targets' morality and sociability did not factor together, differed in terms of mean levels, and did not correlate any more highly than they did with judgments of competence. An additional study found that cluster analysis differentiated judgments of social groups on the basis of their perceived morality and sociability, and that these dimensions of judgment differently predicted intergroup emotions. I also elaborate a functionalist account of why these three dimensions should matter in person and group perception. In Chapter 2, I build on this functionalist account, and show that morality is the only one of these dimensions that is unambiguously positive -- five studies show that sociability and competence are seen as positive attributes contingent upon a target's positive morality, and are seen as less positive, and sometimes as truly negative, in immoral others. Finally, in Chapter 3, I examine the importance of morality, sociability, and competence in the self. It is widely accepted that people primarily care about morality in others, but primarily care about competence in the self. I challenge this assertion, and show that morality is highly valued in the self. Three studies showed that people are often more upset by challenges to their morality than to their competence or sociability. Moreover, the third study shows that reactions to threats to one's morality, competence, and sociability engage different negative emotions. I propose that morality is at least as central to people's identities as competence, and that prior results suggesting that competence is primary are due to peoples' high confidence regarding their own morality. This program of research emphasizes the importance of morality in everyday social cognition and the distinctness of morality from other evaluative dimensions, particularly sociability.
机译:这项研究探讨了社会认知判断的结构以及道德评估在日常社会认知中的作用。在第一章中,我证明了道德和社交性是人格和刻板印象外行理论中的不同维度,这与主流的社会认知二维模型相反,后者认为这是上级亲社会判断维度的两个紧密相关的方面。在三项研究中,对真实目标的道德和社会交往的判断没有综合考虑,在平均水平方面存在差异,并且与能力判断的相关性不高。另一项研究发现,聚类分析基于对社会群体的道德和社交性的区分来区分社会群体的判断,而这些判断维度可以不同地预测群体间的情感。我还详细阐述了为什么这三个维度对个人和群体的看法都至关重要的功能主义者的观点。在第2章中,我以这种功能主义的观点为基础,并证明道德是这些维度中唯一明确肯定的方面之一-五项研究表明,社交能力和能力被视为取决于目标的积极道德的积极属性,并且被视为在不道德的他人中表现得不太积极,有时甚至是真正的消极。最后,在第三章中,我探讨了道德,社交能力和自我能力的重要性。人们普遍认为人们首先关心他人的道德,但首先关心自我的能力。我对此主张提出质疑,并表明道德在自我中受到高度重视。三项研究表明,人们常常对道德挑战感到沮丧,而不是对能力或社交能力的困扰。此外,第三项研究表明,对道德,能力和社交能力的威胁做出的反应会引起不同的负面情绪。我提出道德至少与能力一样对人们的身份至关重要,而先前的结果表明能力是最主要的,这是由于人们对自己的道德具有高度的信心。该研究计划强调了道德在日常社会认知中的重要性以及道德与其他评估维度(特别是社交能力)的区别。

著录项

  • 作者

    Landy, Justin F.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Social psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 150 p.
  • 总页数 150
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号