首页> 外文学位 >Institutional and Regulatory Economics of Electricity Market Reforms: the Evidence from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka.
【24h】

Institutional and Regulatory Economics of Electricity Market Reforms: the Evidence from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka.

机译:电力市场改革的制度和管制经济学:来自印度,巴基斯坦,孟加拉国,尼泊尔和斯里兰卡的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Five South Asian countries-- India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka -- embarked on electricity market reforms in the 1990's. The dissertation uses the framework of New Institutional Economics to assess the effects on electricity sector performance of both observables elements of reform (i.e. privatization, unbundling, establishment of independent regulatory agencies etc.) as well as the unobservable elements (informal beliefs, habit, norms and culture of the actors involved in reforms). The first part of the dissertation -- econometric analysis of the relationship between observable electricity market reform measures and performance indicators -- finds that for the most part electricity market reforms in South Asia are having a positive impact on the performance of the sector. This is particularly the case for reforms that have increased private sector participation in generation and distribution and have vertically unbundled utilities into generation, transmission and distribution entities. Many of the reforms are positively correlated with higher tariffs, indicating a cost to the consumers from the reforms. The relationship between independent regulation and performance indicators , however, is not established.;The second part of the dissertation - analytical narrative of the reform experiences of Gujarat and Nepal -- examines the informal elements (such as beliefs, norms, culture) that motivate behavior and explains how and why reform outcomes differed in these two places. The dissertation finds that the strength of formal institutions rules and the nature of social norms and customs have a significant influence on the outcome of reforms. Aided by the strength of its formal institutional framework and more evolved social norms and customs that encouraged people to follow formal rules, reforms in the Indian state of Gujarat were a success. The weakness of the formal institutional framework and the predominance of relation-based norms and customs in Nepal that led to limited compliance with formal rules, by contrast, limited the success of power sector reforms there.;Efforts to reform the electricity sector in South Asia undertaken by governments with the assistance of development agencies such as the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank have focused to a large extent on getting the content of electricity market reform measures such as unbundling, privatization, and establishment of a power market right. The analysis in this dissertation suggests that such measures will be more successful in places with relatively robust formal rule based systems. Countries that are planning to carry out significant reforms in the electricity sector will benefit from the explicit consideration of the informal norms, habits and customs of the actors that will be affected by the reforms.
机译:1990年代,五个南亚国家(印度,巴基斯坦,孟加拉国,尼泊尔和斯里兰卡)着手进行电力市场改革。本文采用新制度经济学的框架,评估了可观察的改革要素(即私有化,分拆,建立独立的监管机构等)以及不可观察的要素(非正式的信念,习惯,规范)对电力部门绩效的影响。和参与改革的行为者的文化)。论文的第一部分-对可观察到的电力市场改革措施与绩效指标之间关系的计量经济学分析-发现南亚大部分地区的电力市场改革对该部门的绩效产生了积极影响。对于改革的情况尤其如此,这些改革增加了私营部门对发电和配电的参与,并使公用事业垂直捆绑到发电,输电和配电实体中。许多改革与更高的关税正相关,这表明改革给消费者带来了成本。然而,独立监管与绩效指标之间的关系尚未建立。论文的第二部分-古吉拉特邦和尼泊尔改革经验的分析性叙述-研究了激发动机的非正式因素(例如信仰,规范,文化)行为,并解释了这两个地方的改革结果如何以及为何不同。论文发现,正式制度规则的强度以及社会规范和习俗的性质对改革的结果有重要影响。在其正式制度框架的力量以及不断发展的鼓励人们遵循正式规则的社会规范和习俗的帮助下,印度古吉拉特邦的改革取得了成功。相比之下,尼泊尔的正式体制框架薄弱,以及基于关系的规范和习俗占主导地位,导致对正式规则的遵守有限,这限制了该国电力部门改革的成功。;南亚电力部门改革的努力由政府在世界银行和亚洲开发银行等发展机构的协助下开展的工作,在很大程度上集中于获取电力市场改革措施的内容,例如捆绑,私有化和建立电力市场权。本文的分析表明,在具有相对健全的基于正式规则的系统的地方,此类措施将更为成功。计划在电力部门进行重大改革的国家将从明确考虑将受到改革影响的行为者的非正式规范,习惯和习俗中受益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Singh, Bipulendu.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Energy.;South Asian studies.;Economics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 319 p.
  • 总页数 319
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号