首页> 外文学位 >On Liberal Grounds: Judith N. Shklar on Politics, Morals and Human Dignity.
【24h】

On Liberal Grounds: Judith N. Shklar on Politics, Morals and Human Dignity.

机译:自由方面:朱迪思·N·什克拉(Judith N. Shklar)谈政治,道德和人的尊严。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

'Political liberalism' is a concept within political philosophy that has gained much traction since the late 20th century, but it generally fails to address adequately the moral and political grounding of liberal societies. John Rawls is usually the central figure affiliated with this concept; however, the work of Judith Shklar is a valuable and underappreciated resource in considering political liberalism.;Shklar's work often is classified as political liberalism in the sense that she distinguishes questions of politics from those of ethics, religion or philosophy. Shklar differs, though, from other political liberals in her skepticism that an overlapping consensus regarding justice ever can be achieved. Her unique assertion that injustice and vice, rather than justice and virtue, must be the primary focal points of liberal theory is both illuminating and perplexing. Instead of a summum bonum, Shklar holds that the only moral basis upon which liberalism can draw is the presence of a summum malum: cruelty. She does not view the pursuit of positive ends as liberalism's main objectives. Thus liberalism, for Shklar, cannot be based on a foundation beyond its negative, or restraining, capacities.;Through a close analysis of the broad spectrum of her writings, this study argues that Shklar's primary moral dictum on the avoidance of cruelty is not the sole moral grounding of her 'liberalism of fear'---and that adopting the viewpoint of Shklar's 'liberalism of permanent minorities' is a way to conceptualize this assertion. Human dignity underpins and elevates her summum malum to its place within her liberal perspective. The implications of this argument extend into the broader relationship between dignity and political liberalism, suggesting that a foundation of human dignity in fact provides for and sustains a politically liberal public order.
机译:“政治自由主义”是政治哲学中的一个概念,自20世纪末以来已受到广泛关注,但它通常无法充分解决自由社会的道德和政治基础。约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)通常是与此概念相关的中心人物。然而,朱迪思·什克拉(Judith Shklar)的著作在考虑政治自由主义方面是宝贵而又未被重视的资源。什克拉(Shklar)的著作通常被归类为政治自由主义,因为她将政治问题与伦理,宗教或哲学问题区分开来。什克拉(Shklar)与其他政治自由主义者的不同之处在于,她对能否达成关于正义的重叠共识持怀疑态度。她独特的断言,不公正与恶行,而不是正义与美德必须是自由主义理论的主要焦点,这既有启发性又令人困惑。什克拉(Shklar)认为,自由主义可以借鉴的唯一道德基础不是总和,而是残酷的总和。她并不认为追求积极的目标是自由主义的主要目标。因此,对于什克拉来说,自由主义不能建立在其消极或约束能力之上的基础上。通过对她著作的广泛范围进行仔细分析,本研究认为,什克拉在避免残酷行为方面的主要道德格言不是她“恐惧的自由主义”的唯一道德基础,以及采纳什克拉(Shklar)的“永久少数民族的自由主义”的观点,是将这一主张概念化的一种方式。人格尊严在其自由主义的视野中巩固并提升了自己的地位。该论点的涵义延伸​​到尊严与政治自由主义之间的更广泛关系,这暗示着人类尊严的基础实际上提供并维持了政治自由主义的公共秩序。

著录项

  • 作者

    Thomas, Anne Roan.;

  • 作者单位

    The Catholic University of America.;

  • 授予单位 The Catholic University of America.;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 211 p.
  • 总页数 211
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号