首页> 外文学位 >London calling: The London corresponding society and the ascension of popular politics.
【24h】

London calling: The London corresponding society and the ascension of popular politics.

机译:伦敦的呼唤:伦敦相应的社会和大众政治的提升。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This proposed dissertation will focus on the short but historically important life of the London Corresponding Society (LCS) in Britain in the last decade of the eighteenth century, from 1792-1799. The intent of such a focus should serve as a way to better understand the spread of political participation in Britain at the end of the eighteenth century and the key role that the London Corresponding Society played in that phenomenon. This dissertation will also suggest and argue that the London Corresponding Society effectively leveraged and even accelerated an existing trend toward widening political participation through the use of a growing mass media, a more politically astute public sphere, and a language of political engagement that was carefully constructed to represent a reconciliation with British constitutional traditions and ideals, rather than any radical break from the past as was the case in France during this period. To that end, this dissertation will attempt to answer the following historical questions:;1. What role did the London Corresponding Society play in the widening of political participation in Britain at the end of the eighteenth century? 2. What approaches, methods, and tactics were utilized by the London Corresponding Society in their quest to achieve their objectives of parliamentary reform and universal manhood suffrage? 3. To what extent did the London Corresponding Society and other such political associations contribute to a widening public sphere in late eighteenth century Europe? 4. To what extent was the London Corresponding Society influenced by the events in America and France in the late eighteenth century, and how did that impact the methods the London Corresponding Society used to achieve their goals and objectives? 5. What is the historical legacy of the London Corresponding Society?;The rise and fall of the LCS, while short in duration, marks another important mile marker in the evolution of British politics, and can and should be used as a prism with which to view the changing nature of political culture in Britain and its empire during this period. Founded primarily by Thomas Hardy, a shoemaker, the LCS began as a group committed to political education, but the LCS quickly evolved into something that was much more politically and publically aggressive, leading to the arrests and deportations of many of its members. The fact the LCS and other such groups were established as the French Revolution radicalized was not lost on British conservatives and authorities, and connections were drawn between what had happened in America beginning in 1776, and what was happening in France beginning in 1789, and the threat that posed to political, social and economic stability in the British Empire.;The British government watched the development of these "radical" groups closely, including the use of local police officials and spies, and had access to most of the correspondence of the LCS, as we now do. One need not read too far into the correspondence of the LCS without divining their political goals in the Society's support of the ideas of Thomas Paine, its congratulatory letters to the new Jacobin leaders of France, and its attempts to organize groups in Scotland in preparation for a British convention of radical reformers. All of this resulted in harsh crackdowns by the British government, including the suspension of Habeas Corpus in 1794, and part of the story of the LCS is its ability to persist and survive, at least temporarily, in this politically charged environment. The LCS managed to hold huge rallies in London in 1794 and 1795, and there are some estimates that a rally led by LCS co-founder John Thelwall was attended by 100,000 people. LCS founders Hardy, Thelwall, and others, were arrested and tried for treason and sedition in 1794 and 1795, and the LCS was ultimately put to an untimely death in the 1799 with the passage of the Corresponding Societies Act.
机译:这篇拟议的论文将着眼于18世纪最后十年(1792-1799年)英国伦敦通信协会(LCS)在短暂但具有历史意义的生命中。这种关注的目的应该是更好地了解18世纪末英国政治参与的扩散以及伦敦通讯社在该现象中发挥的关键作用的一种方式。本论文还将提出和论证,伦敦通讯社通过利用日益增长的大众媒体,政治上更加敏锐的公共领域以及精心构建的政治参与语言,有效地利用甚至加速了扩大政治参与的现有趋势。代表与英国宪法传统和理想的和解,而不是像法国在此期间那样从过去有任何根本性突破。为此,本论文将试图回答以下历史问题:1。伦敦通讯社在18世纪末在扩大英国的政治参与中发挥了什么作用? 2.伦敦通讯协会采用了什么方法,方法和策略来实现议会改革和普遍的成年选举权? 3.伦敦通讯社和其他此类政治协会在多大程度上对18世纪后期欧洲不断扩大的公共领域做出了贡献? 4.伦敦通讯社在18世纪后期受到美国和法国事件的影响在多大程度上?这对伦敦通讯社用来实现其目标的方法有何影响? 5.伦敦通信学会的历史遗产是什么?; LCS的兴衰虽然持续时间短,但标志着英国政治发展的另一个重要里程碑,可以并且应该作为与之联系的棱镜。了解这段时期英国及其帝国政治文化的变化本质。 LCS主要由制鞋商Thomas Hardy创立,最初是一个致力于政治教育的团体,但LCS迅速演变为更具政治和公共侵略性的事物,导致其许多成员遭到逮捕和驱逐出境。在法国大革命爆发之时,LCS和其他类似组织成立的事实并没有被英国的保守派和当局所忽视,并且在1776年美国发生的事情和1789年法国发生的事情与威胁到大英帝国的政治,社会和经济稳定。;英国政府密切注视着这些“激进”集团的发展,包括使用当地警察和间谍,并获得了该集团的大部分信件。 LCS,就像我们现在所做的那样。在学会支持托马斯·潘恩的思想,向法国新雅各宾派领导人致贺信以及组织在苏格兰组织团体以作英国激进改革家公约。所有这些都导致英国政府严厉镇压,包括1794年哈贝斯语料库的停权,而LCS故事的部分原因是它有能力在这种充满政治色彩的环境中至少持久地生存和生存。 LCS于1794年和1795年在伦敦成功举行了大型集会,据估计,由LCS联合创始人John Thelwall领导的集会有100,000人参加。 LCS的创始人Hardy,Thelwall等人在1794年和1795年因叛国罪和煽动叛乱而被捕,并通过相应的《社团法》最终在1799年过早地将LCS处死。

著录项

  • 作者

    Petersmark, Frank l., III.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.;
  • 学科 European history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 446 p.
  • 总页数 446
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号